User talk:Pesos214

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  03:50, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Reggie Brown (wide receiver). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Boomshadow talk contribs 03:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Reggie Brown (wide receiver). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.  GB fan  talk 03:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  04:00, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

More info
Hello, I apologize for the inexcusable behavior of my fellow editors here. To sum up, Wikipedia likes to have all of it's information sourced. If you make an edit that contains info purely off of your own knowledge, then there is a template that you can add to the page. Sorry, I don't remember what it is :(. Just leave the page for now, but thats so much for all of your great work here! Hope to see you around! Ajraddatz (Talk) 03:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

A suggestion
Sorry for the vandalism warning, but you appear to be inserting opinion, original research (see WP:OR), and analysis. Wikipedia is not a good venue for those. Cited facts and properly attributed quotes are Wikipedia's lifeblood. Respectfully, Boomshadow talk contribs 04:01, 2 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Alright, so Pesos214, the real problem here is that you cannot prove that Brown will be traded or released without a source. I would like to agree that Brown will probably be traded or released, but I cannot prove it since I am not Andy Reid. Please stop adding back that information.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  04:04, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * With all due respect, why don't you tell him instead of warning him? He represents Wikipedia's future, and if you scare him away then he will join the thousands of potential editors lost in this manner. Ajraddatz (Talk) 04:05, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * You are absolutely right, Ajraddatz. I guess I just got caught up in the edit war. I retract my recent warning, and offer a welcome to Wikipedia.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  04:11, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Good job!  Eagles   24/7  (C)  21:45, 2 February 2010 (UTC)