User talk:Peswriter

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 10:26, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

your message on my talk page
Sure, I'll look at anything. What is the article you wanted me to check out? -- Jayron  32  21:01, 5 August 2009 (UTC)


 * It's OK. I found the page by looking at your User contributions.  In the future, if you want to send someone the link to a page on Wikipedia, just put the whole title in square brackets like any other wikilink, so in this case you would just type User:Peswriter/Softdel which gives you a link like this: User:Peswriter/Softdel  Back to the article.  It does not yet appear to meet the inclusion criteria for a new article at Wikipedia.  Its a good start, but there does not appear to be evidence of independent and substantial source material as described at Notability and Notability (organizations and companies).  In order to guarantee that our coverage of a subject is both neutral and verifiable, there needs to be source material about the subject which is independent (i.e. not written by the subject itself, and entirely free from the influence of the subject).  Independence ensures neutrality.  Secondly, there needs to be enough source material so that there can be a substantially verifiable article, that is an article that can cover all of the important facts about the subject, where ALL of those facts have been previously published in independent reliable sources.  Now, the deal is, these issues are not about the quality of the writing in the article, which is a misconception that new users make with understanding why an article may be rejected from Wikipedia.  All of these issues are about the subject itself and an article needs to demonstrate, through the references provided in the article, that the subject has itself been covered by independent, reliable sources in a deep, meaningful way.  Your sources are either published by the company themselves, OR they amount to a trivial amount of coverage, where the name of the company is mentioned "in passing" without there being significant discussion of the company.  Additionally, several of the sources which MAY be independent and/or substantial are currently dead links (when I click them, I get 404 page not found errors).  Keep working on this, and I can check it later, but also understand that there is the distinct possibility that the subject may not actually be notable enough for a Wikipedia article.  -- Jayron  32  22:33, 7 August 2009 (UTC)


 * It's getting better, but not great. Going through every source you provided, and eliminating the self published stuff, I still only come up with maybe 1-2 paragraphs worth of text that have been written about this company.  It's still pretty weak.  If you'd like, it may be a good idea to get further opinions on the article; I would post a request at Help Desk requesting for someone to come and review the article and give their opinion.  -- Jayron  32  15:43, 10 August 2009 (UTC)


 * The new sources you have added look much better. You can probably move it to the mainspace now.  Be aware that once it gets there, others will find it and work on it too.  -- Jayron  32  14:49, 17 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Still getting better. I think going "live" may be a good idea, since it could probably benefit from having other editors work on it as well.  -- Jayron  32  11:59, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I moved the article. In the future, you can just click the "move" tab at the top of the article page to move it.  To take it to the article space, you just move it to the unprefixed name, in this case Softdel.  You can, of course, still work on it, and expect others to come along and work on it as well.  Good luck!  -- Jayron  32  17:18, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Buildingnew.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Buildingnew.JPG I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 12:44, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Regarding Google
Google takes a few days to update their indexes. Changes on Wikipedia are not instantly reflected at Google, and it can sometimes take a while before Google catches the new changes. -- Jayron  32  12:49, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Actually, that tag is fine.
The advert tag isn't a speedy deletion tag; its a cleanup tag and is merely a request for interested editors to help copy-edit and cleanup the article. The deletion tag is db-spam and this article is not currently up for deletion. You should be fine. Lots of articles get tagged for cleanup so that interested editors can help improve the language and tone in some specific way. This one does have some non-encylopedic tone to it, so it could probably use some rewrite. Don't panic; your connection to the company can make it difficult for you to be truly neutral in your tone; leaving the tag allowed other editors to come and take a try at cleaning it up. The article is not up for deletion any time soon. -- Jayron  32  15:05, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Logo_SoftDEL.JPG)
Thanks for uploading File:Logo_SoftDEL.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 06:16, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

File:SoftDEL_Logo.png.gif
I have tagged File:SoftDEL_Logo.png.gif as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 06:20, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SoftDEL Logo.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:SoftDEL Logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
-- Jayron  32  17:44, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SoftDEL Systems


A tag has been placed on SoftDEL Systems requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Nizil (talk) 10:06, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of SoftDEL Systems for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SoftDEL Systems is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/SoftDEL Systems until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nizil (talk) 12:49, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SoftDEL Organization Logo.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:SoftDEL Organization Logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 22 May 2017 (UTC)