User talk:Pet-ro

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karm a  fist  22:16, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Your new page Dylan services
I'm concerned about your new page Dylan services. From its contents at start, it doesn't appear to be an encyclopedia entry. If this page is intended to be an encyclopedia article, then please include a short paragraph at the beginning that describes the topic and why it is significant.

If this is a page that will be used to develop a new article, or improve an existing article, it should probably be located as a sub-page in your user space, such as User:Pet-ro\Dylan Services. If you'd like me to move the page to such a location, just let me know.
 * -Rholton 23:05, 12 May 2006 (UTC)


 * After a bewildering set of moves, it is now at User:Pet-ro/Dylan Service Framework. Why on earth did you not move the article and its talk page together? -- RHaworth 20:14, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Excuse my wild moves related to the page. But it have don't the first time.

What do you suggest? I like to edit further on my user subpage. May it's the best to delete the old Dylan Service page. pet-ro 20:52, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't fully understand the above. Please carry on editing User:Pet-ro/Dylan Service Framework - there is nothing to stop you. Given the confusing number of titles, please be specific: don't just say the old Dylan Service page - provide a wikilink. If you mean Dylan services - which is the best title, in my opinion, then nothing needs to be done to it yet. -- RHaworth 21:01, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
 * On reflection and having looked at your recent edits, I feel it is only fair to warn you that, I think your article is likely to be rejected by Wikipedia as original research. I strongly recommend that you work towards publishing the article on one of your own websites instead. But you should be able to add links to your website in either or both of the existing Dylan articles. -- RHaworth 14:20, 16 May 2006 (UTC)