User talk:PetaRZ

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me or a helper Commander Keane on our talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

If you want to tell me something or if you just want to say hi, leave your message under the Talk Section of | My Talk Page

Ω Anonymous anonymous Ψ: &#39;&#39;Have A Nice Day&#39;&#39; 12:43, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Zvezdno Obshtestvo Observatory
I have removed Zvezdno Obshtestvo Observatory from Articles for deletion/Log/2007 May 22. If you wish to nominate an article for deletion, please read the proper way to do so at Articles for deletion. A ecis Brievenbus 19:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * OK, I'll repeat the procedure, firmly following the rules. PetaRZ 19:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * If you need any help, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. A  ecis Brievenbus 19:20, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, if I encounter any problem, I'll ask you. PetaRZ 19:21, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Let me know if did something wrong, but I think that now it's O.K. PetaRZ 19:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * It's ok this time :) A  ecis Brievenbus 00:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Kirlian photography. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:09, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * In looking over the talk page comments, there seems to be a misperception about PhD dissertations; WP:RS does state that they are considered reliable sources. They are essentially peer-reviewed publications. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * There isn't any edit war; did you check the talk page? MrX who reverted my last edit finally agreed that the content should be removed. Between my two last edits, even though they look the same, a consensus has been reached. Also, I didn't challenge the fact that a PhD thesis is a peer-reviewed publication, I only pointed out the fact that it is a primary source, par excellence. The lack of secondary sources reviewing the importance of this particular publication shows that probably it's not worthy for inclusion in Wikipedia, for more details please look up the talk page. −PetaRZ (talk) 16:37, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Apologies for the template message. I saw the revision history of the page and noted you removed sourced content 3 times, and that there was controversy on the talk page about its inclusion. I didn't see a real consensus, although I did note you acknowledged in your edit summary that the consensus may be difficult to discern. Feel free to delete this section from your talk page. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:31, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Please apologize you too, I should have explained more carefully why I removed this content. As I explained in the summary, User:Mbreht is not hearing any arguments and it's difficult to discern the consensus mainly because of his, sometimes incomprehensible, input. A newly registered editor joined the discussion and is discussing in the same style. For me it's an obvious case of promoting original research: all references are primary sources. I would not object any inclusion of material, as far as accessible reviews of this research can be found and cited here. −PetaRZ (talk) 18:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Varna International Ballet Competition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page José Carlos Martinez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)