User talk:Pete731

November 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at Jamie McCourt. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. clpo13(talk) 02:00, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Jamie McCourt
Continuing to add unsourced information to Jamie McCourt is unproductive, especially since you've been doing it for years now with your changes consistently reverted. You should discuss your proposed changes on the talk page (along with reliable and verifiable sources supporting your claims) instead of reverting Spanneraol every month or so. Maybe edit some other (unrelated) articles. Remember, WP:3RR is a bright-line rule, but edit warring in any form, even over the course of months or years, can result in sanctions. clpo13(talk) 04:28, 17 October 2015 (UTC)