User talk:PeteREpete72

August 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Amigao (talk) 23:53, 13 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia has become a propaganda tool for the Washington DC regime, the CIA and "shapes the narrative" of sheeples in the US. I'm not the ONLY person recognizing the DISRESPECT to the Communist Party of China by continuously disrespecting it by using WRONG names. What a disgrace Wikipedia has become. It is NOT a reliable source of NEUTRAL information. PeteREpete72 (talk) 01:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Amigao (talk) 00:03, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * I thought it is more RESPECTFUL to use OFFICIAL names as per legitimate are recognized Government of China versus what ONLY the US disrespectfully uses. PeteREpete72 (talk) 17:39, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * You might want to first check out WP:COMMONNAME and start with Talk:Chinese Communist Party for background context. Amigao (talk) 20:03, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has become a propaganda tool for the Washington DC regime, the CIA and "shapes the narrative" of sheeples in the US. I'm not the ONLY person recognizing the DISRESPECT to the Communist Party of China by continuously disrespecting it by using WRONG names. What a disgrace Wikipedia has become. PeteREpete72 (talk) 20:52, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generaliation, other talk pages such as Talk:Bucha massacre are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. Prolog (talk) 12:55, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   13:47, 19 August 2023 (UTC)


 * GOOD. I take it as a badge of honor. Wikipedia ZIS the CIA, propaganda tool for the US regime PeteREpete72 (talk) 16:26, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * GOOD. I take it as a badge of honor. Wikipedia IS the CIA, propaganda tool for the US regime. PeteREpete72 (talk) 16:28, 19 August 2023 (UTC)