User talk:PeteStacman24

January 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Windy City (film) has been reverted. Your edit here to Windy City (film) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkRCm1nTZpE) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:36, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to The Super Bowl Shuffle have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to The Super Bowl Shuffle was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=VfCYZ3pks48) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:50, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2019 Kids' Choice Awards. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Brojam (talk) 03:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Spider-Verse, you may be blocked from editing. Philipnelson99 (talk) 02:04, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:PeteStacman24/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:PeteStacman24/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:PeteStacman24/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:PeteStacman24/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:23, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Izuku Midoriya (character) (February 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Izuku Midoriya (character) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Izuku Midoriya (character), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Izuku_Midoriya_(character) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Izuku_Midoriya_(character) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:43, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Evangelion articles
Hey there. Since you've also made some contributions to the Eva articles here, would you mind, if you have the time, to give a third opinion at Talk:Kaworu Nagisa? The other editor that has been updating the Eva articles is much more adamant about some of the stuff here than he was in the other articles and though his work is generally good it did need adjustments before. I think he doesn't realize he's not close enough to NPOV - he used a lot of inaccurate translations and was way too selective in his representation of facts. I presented some 10+ new sources that were necessary to improve things and had to rewrite about a third of the article. He's not even providing an answer anymore and it bugs me because I don't want to discourage him. I am not sure how much you do know or care about Eva, so it might or might not be too long of a discussion, but you can probably just read the section break and chip in. The page is currently locked so there's plenty of time. Thank you. FelipeFritschF (talk) 02:22, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of a joke AfD you created for April Fools' 2021
Hi, I'm letting you know that I've nominated a joke AfD nomination you created for deletion, as it didn't get significant participation on April Fools'. You can participate in the deletion discussion at Miscellany for deletion/Unfunny AfDs from April Fools 2021. Thanks you. Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 12:52, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Izuku Midoriya has been accepted
 Izuku Midoriya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Izuku_Midoriya help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:37, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alzheimer's disease
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alzheimer's disease, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alzheimer's disease and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alzheimer's disease during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — C++ coder (Merry Xmas!!! &#124; talk &#124; talk but in italics) 21:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

You failed to provide reasoning
You did not provide a reason for editing out part of the Tunecore wiki. Please provide reasoning. What you deleted was just simple facts so you should probably provide a reason to hide the truth. DarthlordHelix (talk) 00:24, 10 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Your edit was ridiculously out of place, clashed with the rest of the article, and had no reason to be there. I’m not hiding anything, I’m just keeping maintenance.
 * P.S. I don’t care about TuneCore. PeteStacman24 (talk) 01:20, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
 * P.S. I don’t care about TuneCore. PeteStacman24 (talk) 01:20, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

What is your issue?
Why did you remove the fact that Tunecore has scammed people? It has been proven multiple times and yet you want to hide that? Why are you hiding the truth? DarthlordHelix (talk) 05:18, 15 August 2023 (UTC)


 * I didn’t get rid of your edit because I am pro-TuneCore, I got rid of it because your blurb was out of place; the way you wrote it clashed with the rest of the article. Also, the BBB link doesn’t work for me and I doubt using a YouTube video with an emoji in the title is a good strong source for your “argument”.
 * Plus, do you not see the Copyright Fraud Allegations section of the article? Let that speak for itself.
 * Go warn people about TuneCore somewhere else. In the meantime, please don’t talk to me again. PeteStacman24 (talk) 05:45, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)