User talk:Petecarney

Welcome!

Hello, Petecarney, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! VanTucky 20:55, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Image source problem with Image:Astronaut shadow AS11-40-5930.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Astronaut shadow AS11-40-5930.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:55, 16 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 09:55, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Armstrong heiligenschein.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Armstromg heiligenschein.jpg. The copy called Image:Armstromg heiligenschein.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 11:49, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Removal of tags on HM Bark Endeavour
Do not remove this tag until all the concerns within it have been satisfied. Removing a tag because you don't like it is unacceptable. If you do it again I will file a request for comment on your conduct. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 18:10, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Could you please explain more fully...
I am sure you meant well. But this is a cut and paste. Could you please explain what you are doing? Geo Swan (talk) 00:32, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

HMT Bedfordshire
Hello. I noticed that you added a fact tag at the above article to the following sentence: "The abbreviation HMT - 'His Majesty's Trawler' - identifies the Bedfordshire as a non-commissioned ship." I'm not sure what you're asking for here. A cite to verify the definition of the term? A cite to verify the application of the prefix to this ship? Or both? I just got word that a book related to this came in for me via interlibrary loan today, so hopefully I'll be able to flesh out the article more thoroughly soon. Maralia (talk) 17:02, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi. My query involves the assertion of Bedforshire's status as a "non-commissioned ship". My understanding is that a ship is in commission when an officer has been appointed to command her. this is a 19th century article describing putting a ship in commision. I would take a guess that Bedfordshire may have been commissioned as 'His Majesty's Trawler' but was still 'His Majesty's Ship' by common use of language. Or vice versa. So I'd assume both HMS and HMT are appropriate and should both get a mention somewhere as they are in the bbc reference. My interest in this technicality derives from a discussion regarding the appropriate title for the Bounty (of mutiny fame) where a parallel situation is currently under debate. Cheers --Petecarney (talk) 21:00, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I've asked User:Benea to join in here, as he's vastly more knowledgeable about the RN than I am, and has top-notch sources. On a different topic, I note that when you joined WP:SHIPS you expressed an interest in exploration/discovery ships. Is there a particular period or region you're interested in? We are lacking articles on many of the ships used to explore Antarctica in the early 1900s; any help there would be more than welcome. Maralia (talk) 02:59, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

I just changed the disputed statement to "The use of both HMT - 'His Majesty's Trawler', and HMS - 'His Majesty's Ship' for vessels of this type is well attested by official records." (I haven't said which records but they're easily found) These ships flew the white ensign, and were engaged in offensive actions. They were crewed by naval officers (albeit reservists) who received military decorations,, including the VC. Additionally This page gives a commissioning date for an HMT. According to my understanding of the term, these facts distinguish these ships as "commissioned" in contrast to "non-commissioned" ships such as ships of the Royal Fleet Auxiliary which are civilian crewed and fly a blue ensign. I have found troopships which are sometimes referred to as HMT which were civillian crewed hence not-commissioned. Hope that clears things up - unless of course you find evidence to the contrary. Regarding your suggestion - I will dig out my books on Polar exploration to see what I have on the topic. Cheers. Petecarney (talk) 18:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

WP:SPS
I would suggest that you read it. Nick Cooper (talk) 16:03, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Cool
Very nice pic of Sylvester's heater. Thanks. Victuallers (talk) 21:47, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the feedback, I have a few interesting snippets which I'll add to the article in due course. Petecarney (talk) 18:05, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Various table sauces.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Various table sauces.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 16:32, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mohammed El Naschie


The article Mohammed El Naschie has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Nat Gertler (talk) 05:11, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Followup RFC to WP:RFC/AAT now in community feedback phase
Hello. As a participant in Requests for comment/Abortion article titles, you may wish to register an opinion on its followup RFC, Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage, which is now in its community feedback phase. Please note that WP:RFC/AAMC is not simply a repeat of WP:RFC/AAT, and is attempting to achieve better results by asking a more narrowly-focused, policy-based question of the community. Assumptions based on the previous RFC should be discarded before participation, particularly the assumption that Wikipedia has or inherently needs to have articles covering generalized perspective on each side of abortion advocacy, and that what we are trying to do is come up with labels for that. Thanks! —chaos5023 20:31, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
I have the first edition paperback version, which has it on p.5. Thanks for the help in fixing the citation for the online reference, much appreciated. Wee Curry Monster talk 15:29, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

City of Adelaide (1864)
As you are a previous editor of City of Adelaide (1864), you may be interested in the Style Proposal on Talk:City of Adelaide (1864) ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 22:20, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=665388852 your edit] to John Rae (explorer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:41, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * link in the Northwest Passage as followed in the following century by Amundsen although Arctic historian William Barr has refuted that claim <

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Joseph Sankey
You have created an unsourced substub. I prefer the former redirect.Xx236 (talk) 09:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Changing unit measurements
Please don't change unit measurements without providing a conversion as this changes the value by something like 10% on the B-17 page. I've used the Template:Convert template to display both numbers in tonnes/tons. - MTWEmperor (talk • contribs) 00:36, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Franklin's lost expedition
Franklin's lost expedition has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 10:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)