User talk:Peteg913

Upload
Thanks for uploading Image:202588.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 06:58, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Imagesdsss.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Imagesdsss.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 19:46, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

New account
Well done! Kilo-Lima|(talk) 15:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism Protection
You definitely should ask an administrator to Vandalism Lock Crisis Zone since there's a pesky AOL user who's been reverted two times for using nonsense to discredit the game. I will tell an administrator to do so as well. &mdash; Mark Kim (Reply/Start Talk) 02:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Protection
Hi Pete, sorry but the user is an AOL IP, which means the person who vandalised then will not be the person vandalising the other article. There has also not been "enough" vandalism to the article for it to be protected, see WP:PPOL for more info, and when an article can be protected; also the vandalism appears to have died down, so there is no need to worry: revert! If the vandalism get to something like this, the protection can come in. If there are any other things you need me for, or you wish for me to protect the article when vandalism gets out of hand, feel free to contact me on my talk page. Thanks! Kilo-Lima|(talk) 19:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Hamden Hall
You really don't need to keep reverting positive edits on Hamden Hall. Please check to see if the previous edit is factual and properly placed before you revert from it. --Eldari 22:18, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

RfA
I suggest you finish creating the RfA before adding it to the RfA page. I did remove it to try and give you time to fix it, but you just blind reverted me, no edit summary or anything. Malformed RfAs normally garner an amazing amount of oppose votes. --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of the Sith 01:00, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Reply to your question
Is there a security concern?  Radio Kirk   talk to me  02:57, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Alright. This entire discussion also will be purged shortly.  Radio Kirk   talk to me  03:00, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:About to land in phoenix.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:About to land in phoenix.PNG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lord Deskana Dark Lord of the Sith 16:41, 4 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Taken care of. peteg913 16:46, 4 June 2006 (UTC)


 * You've retagged it as fair use. That's good. But you still haven't specified the image source as requested. I am obligated to retag the image using . Please specify the image source. In addition, fair use images cannot be used in userspace. Please see WP:FAIR. Thank you. --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of the Sith 17:44, 4 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The image source is my computer. peteg913 17:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

If I may reiterate the point made by Lord Deskana, fair use laws require that a copyrighted image be used as a pictorial representation of a subject (see fair use criteria), so this image could only be used on the article page for the game itself or in some sort of comparison article that does not violate WP:NOT. If you have any questions, please ask. :)  Radio Kirk  <tt> talk to me </tt> 20:34, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Thanks again
I believe you will find that most admins are "reasonable", which is why AmiDaniel unblocked you following discussion with Glen and me. Even Glen admitted his position was "off base."

"I will create a god damn archive when I have time" is not a threat per se, but it certainly violates WP:CIVIL. Even in situations where an editor feels (s)he is being incivil in response to someone else's incivility, it is always wise to take the high road instead; once you hit "send", your words are in the history forever, except in rare cases (security issues, etc.). As for removing data from the talk page, anyone can, though it's considered polite to archive them instead (see my talk page for an example of on-site archiving, which is preferred); however, WP:VAND states, "Removing warnings for vandalism or other issues from one's talk page may also be considered vandalism", and that should apply to administrators, as well. If you feel an admin is circumventing that guideline, you should bring it up (as civilly as possible, naturally) at the Administrators' noticeboard.

Hope this helps. <tt> Radio Kirk </tt> <tt> talk to me </tt> 17:37, 4 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Absolutely positive. This isn't just Wikipolicy, it's the law. <tt> Radio Kirk </tt> <tt> talk to me </tt> 20:56, 4 June 2006 (UTC)


 * A self-taken photo of you playing the game might be acceptable, with appropriate copyright acknowledgement, if the most prominent feature of the image is you. And, you wish me to delete Image:About to land in phoenix.PNG, correct? <tt> Radio Kirk </tt> <tt> talk to me </tt> 21:01, 4 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Done. <tt> Radio Kirk </tt> <tt> talk to me </tt> 21:03, 4 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Ask at Commons&mdash;even I have trouble finding images there ;) <tt> Radio Kirk </tt> <tt> talk to me </tt> 21:05, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application
Dear Peteg913,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact with the new 1.2 version release it has even more power. As such we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again in the not too distant future. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof.

Prodego <sup style="color:darkgreen;">talk  00:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Modifying your sig
See here. Hope this helps. <tt> RadioKirk  talk to me </tt> 23:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Um... well, yeah, it's nice, but you'll have to give some of it up. WP:SIG recommends no more than 300 characters, and yours is 418 (not including the date). Some editors will just up and change it so they don't have to navigate though all that code, so cut it down and you won't have to deal with that. <tt> RadioKirk  talk to me </tt> 00:38, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, unfortunately, you're counting the result, not the code. The code to create the result is 418:
 * " M r .  B  a  g  e  l   leave me one  <font color='maroon' size='1px'>peteg913"
 * <tt> RadioKirk  talk to me </tt> 00:44, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Apologies but, basically, you can't. You will have to give up some of the exposition. Even when you get it under 300 characters, some users will complain, so be ready. <tt><font color="#161">RadioKirk  talk to me </tt> 00:57, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I meant you can't decrease the number of characters and make it look exactly as it does now, sorry I wasn't clear. And, as for Stollery's, I haven't looked, but any sig over 300 characters can be changed at any time. <tt><font color="#161">RadioKirk  talk to me </tt> 01:09, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Hehe 297... that will work when dealing with most users. <tt><font color="#161">RadioKirk  talk to me </tt> 02:02, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Whew, that's bright
<< Start sig paste >>
 *  Mr. Ba  ge  l   leave me one  <font color="maroon" size="1px">peteg913  15:16, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

<< End sig paste >>

Some would say "eye gouging" but that's a matter of taste.

I don't mind an incandescent signature to some point. I can recognize a colour faster than a letter, so they are still doing the job in identifying the editor. And I could care less about length, I have never had even one second's issue with sorting the comment from the code. Even if I did, I'd just use preview.

But shave a monkey and call him dad, yours is distracting. I humbly present a gallery of possible styles. brenneman color="000000" title="Admin actions">{L} 13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Stream one
Having a totally different username than your sig is done, but it's easier on everyone for there to be some correlation. If you choose to continue as "Mr. Bagel" why not ask for a name change? Also noting that there are two links to the user page in the current sig, there's no loss in functionality by dropping the redundant pastry. (Note that here the talk links are fake: They go to WP:TODO instead of here, so that you can see what the sig would look like elsewhere.)


 * 1) Peteg913 | talk 13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) <font color="#228B22">Peteg913 <font color="#228B22">(Peteg913 me!) 13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) <font color="FF4500">Peteg913 <font color="FF4500">{T} 13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 4)  Peteg913 E@ 13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) <font color="#ff00ff">Peteg <font color="#ff00ff">913 | <font color="#008000">E  | <font color="#ff00ff">talk  19:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) <FONT COLOR="#FF003e">P</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF553e">et</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF803e">eg</FONT>'ɸ'<FONT COLOR="#FFC03e">913</FONT> 13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Stream two
All the cool kids are redirecting their user page straight to their talk. This is one less link to include, plus it helps to remind us that the encyclopedia is what we're here for. (Links to WP:TODO as above.)
 * 1) Peteg913
 * 2) Peteg&plusmn;913  13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) <font color="Olive">Peteg913 ~ 13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) <font color="#000000">peteg913  [[Image:International Biohazard Warning Symbol.svg|15px|]]leave me one 13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 5)  ʒ  Peteg913: t / ʑ  13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 6)  Peteg913 13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

And a note
It's always a bad idea to stir things up when tensions are high. You get more flies with sugar, they say. brenneman color="000000" title="Admin actions">{L} 13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

A little tweak
Again, using the TODO link to show what it will look like on other pages. I still thinks that "leave me one" is a bit too long, just balance wise. And if you're good, I'll give you a diff to where I was playing with my sig. "Stop before you go blind!" they said, so I only did it until I needed glasses. - brenneman  color="000000" title="Admin actions">{L} 03:30, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) <font color="#000000">peteg913  [[Image:International Biohazard Warning Symbol.svg|15px|]]leave me one 20:42, 12 June 2006 (UTC) (15px)
 * 2) <font color="#000000">peteg913  [[Image:International Biohazard Warning Symbol.svg|15px|]] leave me one 20:42, 12 June 2006 (UTC) (15px)
 * 3)  peteg913 [[Image:International Biohazard Warning Symbol.svg|17px|]] leave me one 13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC) (17px)
 * 4)  peteg913 [[Image:International Biohazard Warning Symbol.svg|17px|]] leave me one 13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC) (17px)

Yes
Why? - Glen Stoll e ry 06:19, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

A short Esperanzial update
As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.

As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Esperanza/June 2006 elections.

Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, &mdash;Cel es tianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Airport 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Airport 2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 02:04, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Spring4.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Spring4.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 03:06, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Concourse.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Concourse.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Moved Page
Pete, I moved Peteg913/warnings to User:Peteg913/warnings. Your user name is just a username, and I think you created an article by accident instead of a subcategory of your username.  B e  a  rly  541  05:27, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't know what you are refering to when I don't sign my username, but I deleted your page because you mistakenly created it in mainspace instead of userspace. Bearly 541  02:36, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, could you please delete your image on your signature because it violates WP:SIG. Thanks.  Bearly  541  02:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Concordia Newsletter
NEWSLETTER

Concordia is currently trying to relaunch. I, and all the members of the ex-council, wish to welcome new members to the group. We are a group who aim to promote remaining civil, in an environment where messages can easily be interpretated wrongly.

Help out now!
We are a community, so can only work though community contributions and support. It's the helping that counts.
 * Try and help people remain civil! Talk to them, and help them in any way possible. Do not be afraid to use the talk page.
 * Give people the Civility Barnstar.
 * Make and spread some Wikitokens so people know there are people to help if they want assistance.
 * Add banners or logos to your userpage to show your support.
 * Suggest some ideas! Add 'em to the talk page.

Decision Making
The council expired one month ago, but due to the current position of the group the current council will remain until the position of the group can be assessed, and whether it would be sensible to keep Concordia going. For most decisions, however, it will be decided by all who choose to partake in discussions. I am trying to relaunch because of the vast amounts of new members we have received, demonstrating that the aims are supported.

If you wish to opt of of further talk-page communications, just let us know here.

- Ian ¹³  /t  20:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC). Kindly delivered by MiszaBot.

Delta logo
Just to let you know, in 2005, Delta re-adopted the "widget" logo with the triangular base. I have reverted to that version. Andros 1337 02:20, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hhlogo4323.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Hhlogo4323.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Logo12332.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Logo12332.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Hartford Meetup: We need your help!
The next Connecticut Wikipedia meetup will take place sometime during April 2009 at Real Art Ways cafe and arts center in Hartford, Connecticut. Please list on the meetup page whether or not you can go. Also please contribute ideas for topics and dates! Hope to see you there! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:57, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Connecticut Meetup: You are invited!
The 2nd Connecticute Meetup will take place on April 18th, 2009 at Real Art Ways cafe and arts center in Hartford, Connecticut. Please state whether or not you can attend on the meetup page. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) because your name was on the invite list. 16:33, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

An exciting opportunity to get involved!
As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. -  Trevor  MacInnis   contribs  03:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tweed logo6364622.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Tweed logo6364622.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tweed New Haven Airport Logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Tweed New Haven Airport Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:41, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Hvnaerial112011.png
Thanks for uploading File:Hvnaerial112011.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. multichill (talk) 23:15, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer permission
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   21:31, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Rollback
Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:
 * Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
 * Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
 * Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
 * Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
 * Please read Help:Reverting and Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
 * You can test Rollback at New admin school/Rollback
 * You may wish to display the User wikipedia/rollback userbox and/or the Rollback top icon on your user page
 * If you have any questions, please do let me know.

HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   21:31, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting
Message delivered by Dominic at 09:15, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.

Disambiguation link notification for January 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daytona Beach International Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Compass Airlines (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Hvnaerial112011.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hvnaerial112011.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 05:26, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting
You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 10:14, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

You're invited!
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

This Friday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA
You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:29, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Concourse.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Concourse.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 16:24, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HVNlogo910.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:HVNlogo910.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Sunday July 16: New England Wiknic @ Cambridge, MA
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Proposed deletion of File:Hvnairportdiagram1311.jpg


The file File:Hvnairportdiagram1311.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned image, use File:HVN Airport Diagram.svg instead."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 11:02, 28 January 2021 (UTC)