User talk:Petemagyar

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. User:Ymblanter (talk) 10:59, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Kyrsten Sinema. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  04:15, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Kyrsten Sinema. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 04:59, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * To make it very clear, you may not express your personal opinions in the encyclopedic voice. You did not cite any source for the claim that "[Sinema] does nothing to help the the Democrats", hence we must assume it to be your personal opinion.  It doesn't matter how fervently you believe that, you may not express it here without a citation that says that or words to that effect.  If you continue, you will be blocked from editing.  In addition, please read the following section carefully.  General Ization  Talk  05:23, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Kirsten Sinema shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  General Ization Talk  05:24, 2 June 2021 (UTC)