User talk:Peter.sujak

August 2011
I am sorry ,I am for the first time editing Wikipedia.I have to read more precisely all rules. Sujak

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Kinetic energy. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ''Also, please be advised you are currently approaching violating our Three Revert Rule/Edit War Policies. Please go to the article's talk page to DISCUSS the edit you wish to make before reinstating it.'' R OBERT M FROM LI &#124; TK/CN 21:35, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

You currently are very close to being engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Kinetic energy. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. R OBERT M FROM LI &#124; TK/CN 21:53, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. You are one edit away - please do not make that edit.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Kinetic energy, you may be blocked from editing. R OBERT M FROM LI &#124; TK/CN 21:54, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Kinetic energy. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have now violated the Three Revert Rule. R OBERT M FROM LI &#124; TK/CN 22:52, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Discussions
I am sorry ,I am for the first time editing Wikipedia.I have to read more precisely all rules. Sujak — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter.sujak (talk • contribs)


 * No worries. Please do read them, and please go to that article's talk page to discuss the content you want to add before you try adding it again. And don't forget to sign your posts on talk pages by putting  ~  at the end of them. Best, R OBERT M FROM LI &#124; TK/CN 23:19, 20 August 2011 (UTC)