User talk:PeterCRames/Archives/2014/07

July 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Encapsulation (object-oriented programming) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Encapsulation (object-oriented programming) was changed by PeterCRames (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854372 on 2014-07-19T13:01:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:01, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

SRK deletions
Why remove content instead of tagging it with citation needed? Do you honestly think someone will challenge a statement like "Khan appeared in a total of seven films that year."? You can easily see so on his filmography page. Do you dispute it? I have added cites for the awards, but the others just seem silly. BollyJeff &#124;  talk  18:17, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Oops! It's a BLP. I tried to bring these things to the notice of the concerned editors. Feel free to revert me in future. A query: Is YouTube a RS? I saw some in Ref. --PeterCRames (talk) 18:21, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Got doubtful about Rediff too but I found this --PeterCRames (talk) 18:50, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * All the videos are interviews with the subject. That would be a primary source, which I believe is okay because he is just verifying some personal information.  BollyJeff  &#124;  talk  02:02, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

wikipedia is full of hate
We should become meatpuppets and work for a kinder wikipedia.

Specifically, there is too much indefinite blocks. Admins sometimes give lame excuses that it is not permanent but wikipedia culture is that admins blocks are almost never overturned.

I am fed up with wikipedia that I almost want to vandalise, except that I am a better person than many admins.

Stephanie Bowman (talk) 21:26, 25 July 2014 (UTC)


 * "We should become meatpuppets and work for a kinder wikipedia." Sure! It's my pleasure. I assure you my full cooperation in this endeavor.
 * I think the major problem is that uninvolved users are indifferent. If users care to provide their views on disputes they are not involved, that will provide admins with much better info to base their decisions.
 * Thanks for dropping by! I think Wikipedia is a great place. Of course, everything has shortcomings. I will try my best to raise my voice against those shortcomings. I want Wikipedia to be more accommodative. I believe in counseling rather than punishment. I request you to help me in making Wikipedia a better place. Thanks again. --PeterCRames (talk) 22:26, 25 July 2014 (UTC)