User talk:PeterClaverCullen

October 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. I like too read (talk) 16:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bob Budiansky, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Johand 199 (Talk)  16:40, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Listen all everyone is trying to do is remove creating and possibly add that Megatron'.s name is actually inspired from the Go-bots. If y'all just left it - no problem. Khajidha started this editing war when they put personal comments on his wiki and wished death upon people PeterClaverCullen (talk) 16:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, yes, that would be because you are lying. Megatron's name was not inspired by the GoBots, and you can't cite anything that proves otherwise. Pretending to be Bob Budiansky in edit comments to get your lie on Wikipedia doesn't count. - Chris McFeely (talk) 17:03, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * "Wished death upon people"? Do what? --Khajidha (talk) 17:15, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Bob Budiansky. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 16:46, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 18:08, 6 October 2020 (UTC)