User talk:PeterGriffin11298

Wesley Jonathan - SummerPhD (talk) 01:25, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello
Please don't recreate redirects without sources. We have a policy on verifiability and guidelines on notability and each of these requires references in the articles to show importance to the encyclopedia as a whole.  Them From  Space  01:42, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sea Beast has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \byoutube\.com (links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n19sop2eh5q). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:59, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sea Beast
A tag has been placed on Sea Beast requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Quantpole (talk) 23:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \byoutube\.com (links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n19sop2eh5q). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added  do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the  before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added a hangon template to an article. In order for an administrator to evaluate whether the article should be speedy deleted or not, we request that you provide reasoning, on the article's talk page, for why it should remain.  Intelligent  sium  23:21, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. tedder (talk) 23:56, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Lisa Robin Kelly
Just to let you know, I removed your recent edits to Lisa Robin Kelly here. As per WP:BLP, anything dealing with a biography page must be written conservatively, with regard for the subject's privacy, and reliably sourced. The link you gave for your edits directs to a 404 page, so there's no verification for what you added. As something contentious, the material you added to her page would need to be impeccably sourced. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a note. Thanks! Dayewalker (talk) 00:54, 21 June 2009 (UTC) Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SummerPhD (talk) 23:24, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bryan Fisher
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bryan Fisher, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable. Needs a significant role and significant coverage in independent reliable sources. His most noted role is minor and only sourcing is to an all-encompassing database.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SummerPhD (talk) 18:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Argiris Karras
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Argiris Karras, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SummerPhD (talk) 19:01, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Final warning
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - SummerPhD (talk) 19:03, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brian Kubach
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Brian Kubach, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No notable roles and no reliable sources means not notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SummerPhD (talk) 21:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Nick Jonas
Please refrain from adding dubiously sourced (and poorly written) content to biographies of living persons. Blogcritics.org doesn't even sound like a reliable source, and it doesn't read like one either. It should be obvious that your comment re: Miley Cyrus was a shot below the belt--and it was done without evidence. Also, referring to other editors as "idiots" is not a very smart or civil thing to do, and may invite pot/kettle comparisons. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 21:26, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mark Hapka
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mark Hapka, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SummerPhD (talk) 15:19, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Christopher Oneal Warren
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Christopher Oneal Warren, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SummerPhD (talk) 15:23, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

WP:BLP
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons. - SummerPhD (talk) 15:25, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Danny McKay Project
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Danny McKay Project, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable film. Appears to fail WP:NONFILM

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ttonyb1 (talk) 18:21, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Mark Hapka
I have nominated Mark Hapka, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Mark Hapka. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DreamGuy (talk) 00:17, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Brian Kubach
An article that you have been involved in editing, Brian Kubach, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 16:09, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Christopher Oneal Warren
An article that you have been involved in editing, Christopher Oneal Warren, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 17:00, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Sock puppetry case
You have been accused of sock puppetry. Please see []. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 23:20, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

I swear, I am not a sockpuppet. I've never even heard of the user Zach Benjamin or PeteHastings, and there is no way I would do something like that. I became a user to help wikipedia, and I would never make multiple accounts, one which is for good and one which is for bad. I am not a sockpuppet. Please don't accuse me. Thank you, and you're a very nice user SummerPhd. PeterGriffin11298 (talk) 00:19, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Swearing accomplishes nothing. Calling me "very nice" accomplishes nothing. Please see Defending yourself against  claims of sockpuppetry to determine what, if anything, you feel you need to do. - SummerPhD (talk) 02:36, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. NrDg 01:12, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of The Danny McKay Project
I have nominated The Danny McKay Project, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/The Danny McKay Project. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ttonyb1 (talk) 19:45, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Argiris Karras


The article Argiris Karras has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced BLP, not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 13:00, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Chris Zylka
An article that you have been involved in editing, Chris Zylka, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 13:08, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello PeterGriffin11298! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created  are  Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:47, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Drake Kemper -
 * 2) Argiris Karras -
 * 3) Tommy Lioutas -
 * 4) Jordan Francis -
 * 5) Allen Evangelista -

Articles for deletion nomination of Argiris Karras
I have nominated Argiris Karras, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Argiris Karras. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 03:49, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Spectacular! cast
Category:Spectacular! cast, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.  Mbinebri  talk &larr; 02:22, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Drake Kemper for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Drake Kemper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Drake Kemper until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:38, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jordan Francis


The article Jordan Francis has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence of notability, and no reliable sources for any of the information in the article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:28, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tommy Lioutas


The article Tommy Lioutas has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unref blp that doesn't meet WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:12, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Allen Evangelista for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allen Evangelista is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Allen Evangelista until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC)