User talk:Peter Cunningham 2302

A tag has been placed on Viaduc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Ditto for Viadeo. -- Fan-1967 17:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Viadeo
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Viadeo, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.workspacegroup.co.uk/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=53, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Viadeo and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Viadeo with a link to where we can find that note;
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Viadeo. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Viadeo with a link to the details.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Viadeo/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Viadeo saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!

The same also applies to Viaduc. Please note, that the articles created must conform to several other Wikipedia policies, including Wikipedia's spam policy, conflict of interest policy, Reliable Sources policy, Notability guidelines for businesses, and verifiability, or they will be deleted. Argyriou (talk) 18:21, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Viadeo
Peter, I've replied at my talk page. Argyriou (talk) 16:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

re: Viadeo
I do not understand why you have deleted my article on Viadeo as 'advertising' - I have made only factual statements and no advertising statements such as 'best' 'biggest' etc.

Viadeo is one of the World's largest online business social networks with over one million users in Europe and 700k in China (with the partnership with Tianji).

Please explain to me how on earth you can call a factual statement - this is a network created on this date, with this many users, available in these languages and is used for these purposes can be 'advertising'.

Wikipedia has articles on all our competitors: Linked'in, Xing, Ecademy, Ryze - none of these articles has been deemed 'advertsing'. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Peter Cunningham 2302 (talk • contribs) 18:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC).


 * It was deleted because it was written like an advertisment. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia doesn't need a blow-by-blow description of what makes the product cool, it needs to say why it matters. See Wikipedia's policy on advertisements for further details. If you think other articles also qualify as advertisments, you may nominate them for deletion. Thank you, Fang Aili talk 18:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC)