User talk:Peter Greenwell

image Three araucarias.jpg
Hey Peter, cool photo. I love araucarias. It would be great if you could add to pic some data about where it was taken, just for the curious, like me.

cheers, alexander110 02:08, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Red Cedar move
Hi Peter1968! I have already listed two botanical sources in Toona ciliata:
 * NSW FloraOnline by Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney. See:
 * http://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/cgi-bin/NSWfl.pl?page=nswfl&lvl=sp&name=Toona~ciliata
 * In that site the current name of the Red Cedar is Toona ciliata M.Roem. and Toona australis (F.Muell.) Harms is a synonym.


 * GRIN Taxonomy for Plants by USDA, ARS, National Genetic Resources Program. See:
 * http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?36753
 * Also in this site the current name is T. ciliata M.Roem., and there are 3 synonyms: Cedrela toona, Cedrela velutina, and Toona australis Harms. This site gives natural distribution: Afganistan, China, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Myanmar, Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, AUSTRALIA (NSW and Queensland).


 * Other online sources, for example:


 * Australian Plant Census by Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria. See:
 * http://www.anbg.gov.au/cgi-bin/apni?taxon_id=63392
 * Toona ciliata M.Roem. is again the correct name and Toona australis (F.Muell.) Harms is a synonym.


 * Global Biodiversity Information Facility. See:
 * http://data.gbif.org/species/13744241/
 * The correct name is Toona ciliata Roemer. Synonyms are missing but the common name is Australian Redcedar. Also the distribution map shows that Australia is included in the distributional range. (The map does not show the total range and it includes also some areas where the species is exotic.)


 * AgroForestryTree Database by World Agroforestry Centre. See:
 * http://www.worldagroforestry.org/Sea/Products/AFDbases/AF/asp/SpeciesInfo.asp?SpID=1649
 * The current name is Toona ciliata M.Roem. and there are six synonyms including Toona australis (F. Muell.) Harms. Common names are: Australian red cedar, Australian toon, Burma cedar, Burma toon, Indian cedar, Indian mahogany, Indian toon, moulmein cedar, Queensland red cedar, red cedar, toon tree, toona tree. Geographic distribution, native: Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, India, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam. Australia is missing from this list but identity of the species is clear because of the synonym T. australis and the common name Australian red cedar.


 * NCBI taxonomy database. See:
 * http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?mode=Info&id=67918&lvl=3&p=mapview&p=has_linkout&p=blast_url&p=genome_blast&lin=f&keep=1&srchmode=1&unlock
 * Toona ciliata is the correct name and Toona australis is a synonym.


 * Integrated Taxonomic Information System by Smithsonian Institution. See:
 * http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=29029
 * Toona ciliata. Taxonomic Status, Current Standing: ACCEPTED
 * Search result for Toona australis: Taxonomic Status, Current Standing: NOT ACCEPTED - SYNONYM. Krasanen (talk) 19:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Image sizes
Not sure why the edit -- I based the image sizes on what I had seen around wikipedia, as well as what permitted reasonable legibility. Almost every logo is reproduced between 200 and 250 pixels wide. And you change to 100px. Most screen shots are between 280 and 320 pixels wide. And you change it to 150px. Why? This isn't wapedia. I have reverted the images to the smallest reasonable sizes, to satisfy you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simonwright (talk • contribs) 05:37, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Monroe D.
You may well be right. I tend to revert most undescribed deletions, especially by anons and especially from heavily-vandalized articles. If you think the material should be deleted or trimmed due to the lack of sources then go ahead. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 01:50, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently copied the contents of a page and pasted it into another with a different name. This is what we call a "cut and paste move", and it is very undesirable because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. The mechanism we use for renaming an article is to move it to a new name which both preserves the page's history and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Requested moves to request the move by another. Also, although this instance has been repaired, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:36, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Ys
I don't understand. What mean "folksy edits" ?

Can you explain ? Nicolas.le-guen (talk) 15:12, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

chook picture - tree
I think it might be a mulberry tree. --TheJosh (talk) 01:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Small_bunyapine.jpg
It looks like the problem is with the license on Commons - that version uses a GFDL license with disclaimers, while the en Wikipedia version doesn't. Would you mind changing the license on the Commons version from "GFDL-en" to just "GFDL"? Kelly hi! 05:04, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Nata4.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nata4.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. OsamaK 10:42, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


 * An admin will do so soon. Thank you for your understanding.--OsamaK 10:53, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Armstrong
Just read back my comment at Talk:Warwick Armstrong and it reads a lot harsher than I intended. Sorry if I offended. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 11:27, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Remoteluxury1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Remoteluxury1.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 07:28, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Eyes Oveworld cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Eyes Oveworld cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Les Norton
Thanks for the comment on my talk page. I will try and explain my position in more detail than is possible in an edit summary and hopefully it will make more sense.

I removed the PROD tag because I think there could possibly be a case made that the article is worth keeping. I have my personal doubts about whether the topic is encyclopedic, but I could be wrong; there may be an encyclopedic article that can be written about the subject. I am wary to allow it to be deleted through the PROD process and without a discussion at AfD because at the very least I feel the series of books is notable, even if the character isn't.

I have heard of Les Norton the fictional character and I have never read any of the books, although I can't recall where (perhaps an in-flight magazine?). This leads me to believe that the character may have become of interest to a wider group of people other than just fans of the books and that there may be third-party independent sources that establish notability. As I said, I have my doubts, but AfD has surprised me before. At the moment, I don't know enough to say which way I would !vote at AfD should it end up there; this would probably depend on arguments made by others.

While the article as it is exists is not encyclopedic in tone or up to the standard that we would like to see, these things should be fixed through editing rather than deletion. Even if the topic is deemed to be non-notable, some of the content could be merged to the Robert G. Barrett article or at the very least the title to be redirected there.

I have no objections to you listing it at Articles for deletion. I just feel the topic deserves discussion before deletion. I hope my position now makes some sense. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk

Jack off ...
May I say how much I enjoyed your front page. And for more than one reason. Cheers. --  Jack of Oz    ... speak! ...   07:31, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Husk (fantasy trilogy)
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Husk (fantasy trilogy). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Russell Kirkpatrick. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Russell Kirkpatrick - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Shashwat986 (talk) 06:41, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: St. James station photo
Hi Peter,

Yes they are 'borrowing' my photo. I'm not too fussed though, it's only an old photo.

As for maps of St. James station tunnels, my best bet would be to go to the State/Mitchell Library on Macquarie St. The tunnels are now closed, so it's 'enter at your own risk'.

Hope this helps. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hohohob (talk • contribs) 09:40, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Nr38.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nr38.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Kelly hi! 06:33, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Madouc cover.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Madouc cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 14:12, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Isopogon latifolius
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Foss Theface.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Foss Theface.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Richvalleycouncil.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Richvalleycouncil.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Small-brushbox.jpg


The file File:Small-brushbox.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Small-tuckeroo.jpg


The file File:Small-tuckeroo.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Nh85.png


The file File:Nh85.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:
 * File:Small-tuliptree1.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Bower-vine.jpg


The file File:Bower-vine.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Removed your photo from an article
Just letting you know as a courtesy, your image File:Small-nativebroom.jpg was on the Viminaria article, an upload you made in 2006. Owing to the 240x180 size and not quite modern levels of clarity I opted for a larger, CC-BY licensed photo that's much clearer. I'm not wedded to that photo by any means, and wanted to give you the heads up in case that photo credit was important to you so if desired you can take another one with modern equipment and replace the one I put on the article. --(loopback) ping/whereis 13:33, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Remoteluxury1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Remoteluxury1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:11, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Gaean Reach for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gaean Reach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gaean Reach until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Jontesta (talk) 02:56, 22 May 2024 (UTC)