User talk:Peter James Dalton

December 2020
Hello, I'm Solidhelium. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ronnie Ricketts without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Leo (talk) 06:24, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ronnie Ricketts, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. J ACKINTHE  B  OX   • TALK 09:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Ronnie Ricketts, you may be blocked from editing. (Do not remove sourced content. It looks like he has been found guilty of a crime, so he is no longer considered to be innocent. (See WP:BLPCRIME). There's no reason to remove that section from the article) — SkiM askA ⭐(💬Talk) 09:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Ronnie Ricketts. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC)