User talk:Peter Laskin

November 2013
Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you.  MrOllie (talk) 14:04, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello! I've written you at your's talk page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MrOllie Could you be so kind to reply there! Thanks!

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 16:04, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello! I've written you at your's talk page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MrOllie Could you be so kind to reply there! Thanks!

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 12:32, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

I don't consider my editing to be disruptive. If you don't know anything about code review proccess and what tools are in favour for now please ask somebody who does. Here is my appeal to you which I've posted at your talk page but haven't got any answer. I'll repeat it here. Please answer: "Ok! But what's wrong with paid editions of code review tool. These editions are much more popular and necessary for users then free versions that you've left. You simply cut the very import part from the whole range of the most important code review tools, I think that people should know both free and paid versions. And as I've told paid versions are more popular among professionals, as they are really better. Speaking about "independent sources" you can type the names of these tools in google and see that they have a lot of mentions in "independent sources". Simply type: Code Collaborator, Crucible, Review Assistant if you don't believe me... Or I should find and type the links from "independent sources" here to you? Speaking about external links on the page (I've read you previous discussion with Nathanfunk) - all what we do is for users' comfort. If you think that there mustn't be any external link to the page - delete them. But in that case user should copy and paste product's name to google search in order to find the detailed info! I thought that wiki is targeted at user's comfort! Am I right?"