User talk:Peter Ogwen Jones

Welcome!
Hello, Peter Ogwen Jones, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Ealdgyth - Talk 13:41, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Spam
I've reverted your additions of what is obviously your own book to a number of articles. Please read WP:SPAM, especially the section WP:BOOKSPAM. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:41, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The book may have some merit, is free to download, and is comprehensively referenced. I'm going to read it. Would it be helpful if you (Peter) put something on your user page to help others understand your area of expertise? Also: please don't mark edits as WP:MINOR when clearly they are not.  Tony Holkham   (Talk)  12:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Promotional links
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Verbcatcher (talk) 10:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

September 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Verbcatcher (talk) 11:16, 2 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Remind me - how is a free book on the Croes Naid 'spam'? It is the outcome of a research study over a seven year period, described by an American professor of medieval studies as 'the most definitive source of information on the relic to date', while several Welsh professors responded in a similar manner. I've had many emails from individuals welcoming my work as a valuable contribution to the subject, and yet here are you pontificating in a pompous manner, denying people access to the most comprehensive work on the Croes Naid (under the absurd Wikipedia title, 'Cross of Neith') to date. Perhaps you would care to justify yourself and your arbitrary actions, so I can forward Tony Holkam's 'explanations' to interested individuals, several of whom have contacted me, being baffled by your actions. PETER OGWEN JONES -  2ND SEPTEMBER 2022 Peter Ogwen Jones (talk) 12:33, 2 September 2022 (UTC)


 * A free book might not be spam, but links to it probably are, particularly when they are added by the author of the book.
 * indicated to the relevant guidelines in 2018 (see above), and you have continued to add these links. Please see Spam, which says 'Adding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam.' Whether readers have to pay is immaterial.
 * Posting links to publications that you have written yourself is a conflict of interest, see WP:COI. WP:SELFCITE says "adding numerous references to work published by yourself and none by other researchers is considered to be a form of spamming". Also see WP:EL.
 * Your books may well be valuable contributions to scholarship, but that is beside the point – you should not add links to them on Wikipedia.
 * Verbcatcher (talk) 14:48, 2 September 2022 (UTC)