User talk:Peter Warrington

Welcome to the Wikipedia
Here are some links I thought useful:


 * Tutorial
 * Help desk
 * Foundation issues
 * Policy Library
 * Utilities
 * Cite your sources
 * Verifiability
 * Wikiquette
 * Civility
 * Conflict resolution
 * Neutral point of view
 * Pages needing attention
 * Peer review
 * Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
 * Brilliant prose
 * List of images
 * Boilerplate text
 * Current polls
 * Mailing lists
 * IRC channel

Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. The Village pump is also a good place to go for quick answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~.

Be Bold!

[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2004|Vote Sam Spade for Arbiter!]] 14:10, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Alfred John Shout copyright
This story on Alfed Shout VC MC is definatly a early version of my story on this man, as the writer and the researcher I claim Copyright. Harry Willey harry@victoia-cross.com

Hi Peter, Thanks for tackling the VC migrations. I noticed that the Alfred John Shout article is tagged "Copyright © Harry Willey. 2001." Are you sure this is OK to use? I'm no expert on copyright issues but I generally steer clear of anything that is claimed as being under copyright. I know the article has to be rewritten to merge all the content together (something I am happy to do) but I don't want to waste my time if someone then flags it as a copyright violation. Geoff/Gsl 23:51, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reply. As I said, I'm no expert on copyright.  As far as I know it's OK to contribute copyrighted work as long as the copyright holder has given permission, which I guess we can assume in this case.  Some of the other migrations appear to contain verbatim text from newspaper articles which I doubt are OK, copyright-wise.  As for the images, all the WWII-era and earlier photos will probably be out of copyright.  Likewise I imagine the cigarette card images.  And photos of graves, etc. contributed by people should be OK.  Scans from recent newspapers are probably not OK.  Again I'm no expert. I appreciate the work you've been doing and don't mean to discourage you.  If you're not comfortable with the "nuts & bolts", don't worry -- I'm happy to add categories, fix links, etc. when I have the time. Geoff/Gsl 23:47, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Copyright & Nuts & Bolts
Geoff, thanks. I suppose my point about copyright is that the migration process twice requires the migrator to make statements, the truth of which he knoweth not, and, certainly in the case of images, the upload will be unsuccessful if the box is not checked. As the VC Reference migration is a pre-arranged 'Project' copyright questions should have been sorted out between the owners of the respective sites - n'est pas? Anyway, don't let's labour the point.

Secondly, a comment about Wikipedia 'nuts & bolts'. Don't worry, they won't put me off, but so far I have found almost everything out by trial and error. I find searching Wiki help an onerous task, and seem to spend more time in the help pages than in doing the job. Couple of examples: 1. It would be nice if there was somewhere which stated "This is how to make a disambiguation page from scratch". 2. It would also be nice to be able to access a full list of Wikipedia Editing Script. Once again, trial & error have prevailed. But we will soldier on!

Whoops! Cancel point 2 above - just found the answer. Peter W 23:43, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * I've modified the Shout article to my satisfaction so I am content and have no intention of labouring the point. It was never my intention to suggest you were at fault so sorry if I gave that impression.  If you have any questions, I am happy to answer them as best I can.  Geoff/Gsl 05:47, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Image syntax
I was being overly cautious I think -- I am notoriously bad telling how someone is reacting and often when I look back over my comments, I think I could have phrased things better. I also apologise too much, for which I am sorry.

To answer your last question first, you are discussing things in the appropriate place (as far as there is a "right" way of doing anything on Wikipedia). You comment on my talk page and I respond on yours. It tends to make for disjointed conversations if they drag on. For comments regarding a particular article, you use the article's talk page (the "discussion" link) and perhaps notify other users on their user talk page to join the discussion. For VC migration talk, it would probably make sense to discuss it on the WikiProject talk page. Note that if you watch an article, you are notified when changes are made to the talk page as well.

Regarding John George Smyth, I'm not clear on what the effect you are aiming for is? Do you mean it should reproduce the "click for larger image" effect from the victoriacross.net site? In which case the "large" image should be uploaded instead of the small thumbnail image (Image:E1167 smyth jg sm.jpg). With the large image (e1167_smyth_jg_lg.jpg) to get a small thumbnail in the article but the large image when clicked, the syntax is:


 * [[Image:E1167_smyth_jg_lg.jpg|thumb|Photo of his medal collection at the Imperial War Museum.]]

There are three sections to this; the first (Image:E1167_smyth_jg_lg.jpg) is the name of the image and the last (Photo of his medal...) is the caption. The middle bit contains instructions on how to display the image. You can have more than one instruction, each separated by a '|'. The main ones are justification ("right", "left" or "center"), style ("thumb" for thumbnailed, "frame" for full-size in a frame) and width in pixels (eg., "200px" forces the image, thumbnail or otherwise, to be 200 pixels wide). So for example, a thumbnailed image, 200px wide, centred would use:


 * [[Image:image.jpg|thumb|200px|center|caption text]]

There is more information at Extended image syntax. Sorry if I've totally missed the point of the problem with the Smyth page.

Another thing with images is that they should be "tagged" with their copyright status. The complete, confusing list of tags are at Image copyright tags. The simplest one is "public domain" which you add with. This is safe to use for all the old photos that are migrated (by my understanding, any UK photo published before 1954 is now public domain, similar for Australia). I am not sure what licence should be used for recent photos contributed to victoriacross.net (such as the Smyth medals) -- probably public domain.

You can see the sort of stuff I put on an image page at Image:Alfred John Shout at Quinns Post.jpg. This includes a brief description of the image, source if known and licence tag. With the VC migrated images, it might be worthwhile making our own tag, saying that a). they are public domain and b). acknowledging victoriacross.net as the source, with permission. Something to discuss on the WikiProject page, perhaps.

Some other syntax things which you may already have picked up:
 * to link an image without displaying it, put a colon ':' before the "Image", eg. Image:E1167 smyth jg sm.jpg
 * to prevent something from being interpreted as a link, etc. surround it by ...  (something you would only ever want to do on a talk page, when discussing syntax...)

I have added the WikiProject Victoria Cross Reference Migration page to my watchlist so if you have any VC related comments, especially ones that aren't just directed at me, we can discuss it there. Geoff/Gsl 21:42, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * I've editted the John George Smyth article to use the large image. In ye olde days (last year) it used to be necessary to upload your own thumbnail version of each image, include the thumbnail in the article and provide a "click here for larger image" link, but now the system does the thumbnailing itself so you only need to upload the large image.


 * Other points:
 * Headings. There don't appear to be strict rules about how/when to use headings (at least I can't find an explicit statement on the subject). The general policy appears to be don't overuse headings so don't have empty headings (which is why I delete the "See also" heading on each VC migration) and, in my opinion, don't have single sentence sections, such as "The medal".  I know the migration system follows a format that supplies these headings and it's no big deal.  I tend to delete them but it doesn't hurt to leave them around.
 * Categories. All VC recipient articles should be in Category:Victoria Cross recipients or a sub-category.  In general they should only be in one category, the lowest sub-category the applies, so J.G. Smyth goes in Category:British World War I Victoria Cross recipients only, and not in Category:Victoria Cross recipients, Category:British Victoria Cross recipients and Category:World War I Victoria Cross recipients as well.  (One day it is likely that you will be able to flatten a category to see its contents and its sub-categories contents in one go which avoids the need to include higher categories.)  There are exceptions to the one-category rule such as when a recipient is considered to have two nationalities.  Also, I started the Category:Battle of Gallipoli Victoria Cross recipients but didn't consider it worthwhile to split by nationality.  I imagine the British categories should be split into English, Scottish and Welsh -- I was too lazy when I started and I kind of regret not making the effort now.
 * Geoff/Gsl 07:03, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

James deletion?
Why did you create James Stokes, then blank the page? It's a good article. -- user:zanimum
 * Sorry Zanimum - my ISP decided to ditch me at the critical moment - the page is back up now. Peter W 14:30, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * ISPs are a nuisance. Just checking to make sure. BTW, keep up with the good work on the migration project, it's one of our most valuable WikiProjects. -- user:zanimum

Disambiguation
Hi. You seem to be adding articles without disambiguating English or British. Please disambiguate when adding the articles as these are two of the most common pages that are not properly disambiguated. Thanks. RedWolf 03:19, Nov 26, 2004 (UTC)

Okay, let's take Edward Dwyer:


 * Edward Dwyer was an English recipient of the Victoria Cross, the highest and most prestigious award for gallantry in the face of the enemy that can be awarded to British and Commonwealth forces.

You are linking English, British and Commonwealth without disambiguating them properly. You should be doing something like:


 * Edward Dwyer was an English recipient of the Victoria Cross, the highest and most prestigious award for gallantry in the face of the enemy that can be awarded to British and Commonwealth forces.

Look at the pages for English, British and Commonwealth and you will see *many* possibilities for each. RedWolf 04:26, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC)

SCOTLANDS FORgotten VALOUR
This red-linked article is referenced in lots of your VC pages. Is it supposed to have this strange capitalisation?

Whoever you are (why didn't you sign?) - this is the name of the publication. A play on the inscription on each cross - 'For Valour'.

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Valour Road
Hi. You contributed the picture of the Valour Road plaque. Would you happen to know when the plague was dedicated? Was it at the same time the street was renamed? Isaac R 19:39, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image:E.cenchria.cenchria.1.JPG
Image:E0069_beattie_sh_sm.jpg Image:E0187_carpenter_afb_lg.jpg Image:E1167_smyth_jg_lg.jpg

--Imaek 07:47, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:VCGeorgeHarryWyattGrave.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:VCGeorgeHarryWyattGrave.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 22:29, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:VCRolandRichardLouisBourkeGrave.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:VCRolandRichardLouisBourkeGrave.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mecu (talk • contribs) 22:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Blaker_campmedals.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Blaker_campmedals.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:39, 23 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 05:39, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Blakermc.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Blakermc.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:39, 23 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 05:39, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Blakervc.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Blakervc.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:39, 23 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 05:39, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:VCGeorgeMcKenzieSamson.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:VCGeorgeMcKenzieSamson.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:VCGeorgeSellarGrave.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:VCGeorgeSellarGrave.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:02, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:VCGeorgeStuartWhite.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:VCGeorgeStuartWhite.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:02, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:VCWilliamJohnSymons.jpg
File:VCWilliamJohnSymons.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:VCWilliamJohnSymons.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:42, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Valourroad.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Valourroad.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 23:26, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:VCRichardRaymondWillis.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:VCRichardRaymondWillis.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:49, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:P0228 coffin c2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:P0228 coffin c2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 20:46, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:VCGeorgeHarryWyatt.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:VCGeorgeHarryWyatt.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:37, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:VCDonaldForresterBrownGrave.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:VCDonaldForresterBrownGrave.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 20:56, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)