User talk:Peter parkerrr

Deletion discussion about Kent North
Hello, Peter parkerrr, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Articles for deletion/Kent North whether the article Kent North should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Kent North, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! JoshyDinda (talk) 15:32, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Kent North for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kent North is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kent North (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 01:53, 16 September 2019 (UTC)