User talk:Peterdante33

File:Callumhigginsimage.jpg
Please stop trying to place this image on any page here on Wikipedia. This is a copyright violation of the author's profile on Amazon and will not be accepted here. We take copyright seriously here. There is no indication anywhere that this image is available under a license compatible with Commons, and no indication that this work is in fact yours to do with as you please. If you have questions, please ask. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 19:23, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: C. Higgins (October 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:C. Higgins and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:C. Higgins, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:C._Higgins Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:C._Higgins reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 06:19, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: C. Higgins (November 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hammersoft was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:C. Higgins and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:C. Higgins, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:C._Higgins Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hammersoft&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:C._Higgins reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hammersoft (talk) 18:45, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello, Peterdante33. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:49, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

You're going to need to find independent, secondary, reliable sources to support the notability of this person. Linking to his school is not such a source. Please carefully review WP:NAUTHOR. A self-published author is unlikely to pass that standard. --Hammersoft (talk) 19:12, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

First Crown moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, First Crown, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 21:11, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

File:First crown logo 2018.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Article / Draft writing, and single purpose accounts
Despite twice having your drafts declined noting that you need to find reliable, secondary sources, you still continue to add voluminous quantities of information with little or no sourcing to such sources. Your writing indicates that you have close, personal knowledge of the author and materials in development that are not yet published, generating a direct conflict of interest. It also appears that your editing is tied directly to a single topic. I encourage you to read through Single-purpose account. Please talk with us. --Hammersoft (talk) 19:47, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Paid editing
Hello Peterdante33. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Peterdante33. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Hammersoft (talk) 19:47, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi Hammersoft. Sorry that I've been giving off this impression, I'm just still quite new to Wikipedia and apologize that I've been very persistent on this article. The only reason I've been trying so hard is because I'm part of a group in Stroud who are trying to find info and create pages for various different local celebrities/people that have a reputation that deserves a page, that is my only connection to the subject and I am not paid to do what I do. I'll only return to edit the page again once I've collected the sufficient information and correct sources to justify my info next time. Yet again I'm exceedingly sorry for the mixup and am sorry that you've had to put time into chasing me up. Peterdante33 23:03, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
 * No worries. Thanks for communicating! We can help, but understand that that can't happen without communication. Neither of these articles as they stand in draft form would be acceptable in mainspace because they are so lacking in sources. There's a huge amount of material that has been added without sources indicating where it comes from, how it's supported. It's very important to find secondary sources to support the notability of this person. From my chair, what I see is a self published author of virtually no notability. Find the secondary sources to support it. Otherwise, him and his books will never be articles. Not trying to be critical here, but to help. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:05, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:First Crown


Hello, Peterdante33. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "First Crown".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:57, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft:C. Higgins concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:C. Higgins, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:First crown logo 2018.jpg


The file File:First crown logo 2018.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:C. Higgins


Hello, Peterdante33. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "C. Higgins".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 19:14, 7 February 2020 (UTC)