User talk:Peterdhere

April 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Scotland's Malt Whisky Trail has been reverted. Your edit here to Scotland's Malt Whisky Trail was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/themwt) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:02, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Scotland's Malt Whisky Trail
Hi Peterdhere

I have reverted your edits to Scotland's Malt Whisky Trail, because there were a number of problems with content you added.

Most of them relate to the content you added reading like an an advertisement, and being sourced from promotional websites. Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion; it is an encyclopedia. So it has a strict policy of neutral point-of-view, and of using independent reliable sources.

It's great that you want to improve the article, but please could you spend a little time studying those linked policies? Thanks! -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)