User talk:Peterell

Copyright problems with William Inge Center for the Arts
Hello. Concerning your contribution, William Inge Center for the Arts, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, William Inge Center for the Arts appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. William Inge Center for the Arts has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:William Inge Center for the Arts and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:William Inge Center for the Arts with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:William Inge Center for the Arts.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. PamD (talk) 09:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * In fact I only discovered that this appears to be a copyright violation when I started looking around to get more info for the page - at present it doesn't say where (town / country / continent) this arts centre is to be found. If you start another article, please remember that WikiPedia is international, and that someone might come across your article by hitting the "random article" button, so please make sure that it explains itself and makes sense to someone coming to it by chance. Thanks. PamD (talk) 09:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

COI on page edit
User Peterell edited the page of a person who fired him to include negative information without disclosing his COI. Per the Wikipedia COI policy, "If you believe an editor has an undisclosed COI and is editing in violation of this guideline, raise the issue in a civil manner on the editor's talk page, which is the first step in resolving user-conduct issues, per the DR policy, citing this guideline." I have removed the edit until the COI has been addressed. EditorEricMiller (talk) 20:19, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

COI on page edit
User Peterell has once again revised a page to include negative information without disclosing his COI. EditorEricMiller (talk) 18:50, 1 March 2023 (UTC)