User talk:Peterjhw07

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Peterjhw07, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Sir Haydn. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! —  Tivedshambo   (t/c) 15:44, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

File copyright problem with File:Mf.no4 dv.2a-djm.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Mf.no4 dv.2a-djm.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:27, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:No. 4 Edward Thomas with Gisel Ejector (fitted 1958-69).jpg
Thank you for uploading File:No. 4 Edward Thomas with Gisel Ejector (fitted 1958-69).jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:33, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Sir Haydn departing Brynglas.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Sir Haydn departing Brynglas.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:40, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Falcon from Thomas the Tank Engine.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Falcon from Thomas the Tank Engine.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 18:49, 29 October 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:49, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:No. 6 Douglas in standard TR liverly. 1982..jpg
Thanks for uploading File:No. 6 Douglas in standard TR liverly. 1982..jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 18:57, 29 October 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:57, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Sir Handel.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Sir Handel.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:40, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Douglas (locomotive)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Douglas (locomotive), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.steamindex.com/locomag/locomag12.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:52, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Douglas (locomotive)


A tag has been placed on Douglas (locomotive) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 21:57, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Did you know...
If you're interested, I've proposed that the articles you created about Sir Haydn and Edward Thomas are featured on the did you know section of the main page. See the discussion at WT:UKT —  Tivedshambo   (t/c) 18:11, 30 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Now nominated at Template Talk:Did You Know where you may review the hook, and suggest improvements. Mjroots (talk) 14:08, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Sir Haydn (locomotive)
Orlady (talk) 06:08, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Edward Thomas (locomotive)
Orlady (talk) 06:08, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:No. 6, Douglas in standard TR liverly. 1982..jpg
Thanks for uploading File:No. 6, Douglas in standard TR liverly. 1982..jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 18 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I've deleted the image. Unfortunately, screen-shots of copyright material, even if just on You-tube, are not acceptable on Wikipedia (except for fair-use, which wouldn't apply here). Feel free to upload photos which you've taken yourself, or if there's any photos of the TR you want, let me know as it's quite likely I may already have one. Alternatively I'll probably be in Tywyn in a couple of weeks, so could try to get some more. —  Tivedshambo   (t/c) 21:27, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary&#32;for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. To date, almost all of your edits have lacked a valid edit summary.  Timothy Titus Talk To TT  22:59, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Romney, Hythe and Dymchurch Railway
Thank you for using an edit summary on your recent edit to Romney, Hythe and Dymchurch Railway. It helps the whole system to work properly when we all do that. However, the edit you're trying to make to the article isn't a valid one, for two reasons. I will explain them both.  Timothy Titus Talk To TT  08:21, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Firstly, edits must be referenced. That means you need to provide a footnote which refers to direct evidence, preferably from a third-party website, though it can be from a book or periodical, to support the claim you are making in your edit.
 * Secondly, and most importantly in this case, the TV clip you are talking about doesn't rank as "popular culture". The Romney, Hythe and Dymchurch Railway appears on television around a dozen times every year. The programme you mention is not a key element of popular culture, and nothing about it is having repercussions in popular culture. We DO record the TV broadcasts from the post-war re-opening of the railway, because those broadcasts starred Laurel & Hardie, who are internationally renowned comedians, and so made that broadcast notable. However, we don't just record every time a railway appears on TV. The Romney, Hythe and Dymchurch Railway appeared on my TV last night in an advert, with three little dogs running up the Dungeness line. It has appeared in countless other TV adverts (Marathon, Milkey Way, etc), on news reports, on holiday shows, on quizzes, etc, etc. The full list would run into thousands of TV broadcasts. To be included in the encyclopedia as "Popular Culture" it really needs to be something that "everybody is talking about" or something that stars an A-list celebrity.


 * Just to support Timothy's note above, there's another issue about "in popular culture" links. Most of them aren't commutative - a connection that matters a lot to the TV show often matters far less to the subject. Linking to the RHDR from the show can make sense, but linking to the show from the RHDR page doesn't. This is the main problem with most of the "IPC" links that get added to the encyclopedia. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:49, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Romney, Hythe and Dymchurch Railway, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.  Timothy Titus Talk To TT  17:15, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Monarch (locomotive), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! APerson (talk!) 23:43, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at AfC Dougal (steam locomotive) was accepted
 Dougal (steam locomotive), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Northamerica1000(talk) 23:07, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.