User talk:Petermorriscpa

Frozen pensions
A template has been added to the article Frozen pensions, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. andy 10:00, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

September 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added to the page Frozen pension do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — TKD::Talk 15:54, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Peter Bottomley on Frozen Pensions
I added a reference to Peter Bottomley to try to document the information you added there, but I'm not really satisfied with the current referencing. Rather than edit what you wrote (as I see no particular reason to think it is wrong based on preliminary web searching), I thought I'd ask you if you had a specific source for it. Do you?--Jimbo Wales (talk) 18:49, 10 January 2011 (UTC)