User talk:Peterpeter21

January 2020
Hello, I'm Creffett. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Draft:Royal and Venerable Confraternity of the Most Blessed Sacrament of Mafra—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. creffett (talk) 00:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Draft:Royal and Venerable Confraternity of the Most Blessed Sacrament of Mafra. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. creffett (talk) 00:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

This is a joint project under construction in collaboration with the initial creators who specifically asked for my assistance.
Hi user:Peterpeter21 I am not sure why you have decided to interfere with my project? Unless you were invited to join and try to improve this article by the people who created the draft and nominated me, which does appear to be the case, your good-faith reverts have actually caused disruption with the several hours of editing I spent here today. Not very nice end-result as you can imagine. Please do not do further reverts here at least until the article is approved on Wikipedia- improvements are welcome once the article is up and running. Thank you. Melroross (talk) 02:33, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Irmandade is not a Fellowship! Only one sculpture is attributed to Maragliano! Maragliano was not a carpenter tasked with the installation of the carillons in the towers of the Basilica! “An important part of the society members’s regular duties includes playing the basilica's six historical pipe organs and the Mafra carillons throughout the year” – False! Where did you read that?

Your version does not say what the previous version said. You could do minor repairs and not make a new article with the wrong information. Your article is a new article, with information that is not true.

@ Peterpeter21 Why you came out of nowhere and decided to disrupt a Draft (meaning not a final page) is a bit of a mystery. Now after being respectfully asked NOT to keep interfering and given an explanation, you are engaging on more reverts. That is uncalled for and counterproductive. Worse, it is delaying the approval of an intended new Wikipedia article in case you hadn’t realised that. And who told you that Confraternity, Brotherhood, Fellowship, Society and others do not mean Irmandade depending on the context? It is ultimately up to the editors who created the article in the first place to decide which semantic choice they’d prefer. I have been asked to develop this draft and that’s what I am doing. You are welcome to change, discuss and correct in a constructive way, particularly if that will help getting the draft approved. Thank you for your cooperation. Melroross (talk) 11:59, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * , I'm guessing that you meant to ping Peterpeter21 - I'm not reverting your work. That said, please keep in mind that nobody owns anything on Wikipedia - anyone can edit any page and you can't tell people that they're not allowed to edit something you've worked on. creffett (talk) 13:47, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@ creffett, indeed I thought you used both profiles. Apologies. At this stage it is very important for the creators to bring this article to a Wikipedia publication standard as explained to Peterpeter21. Any constructive editing is more than welcome, from anyone at any time, serial reversals and negative criticism are not. Melroross (talk) 14:24, 19 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks @.--Peterpeter21 (talk) 20:18, 19 January 2020 (UTC)