User talk:Peterpeterson111

September 2023
Hello, I'm Kline. I noticed that you recently removed content from Andrew Rosindell without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kline &#124; yes? 19:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello Peterpeterson111. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Andrew Rosindell, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Peterpeterson111. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. StartOkayStop (talk) 19:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)


 * You are mistaken. 2A00:23C8:308A:E01:2529:2D8F:B439:9AF7 (talk) 19:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Are you Peterpeterson111? Please make sure you are logged in when replying. And could you explain why you believe that I am mistaken? You-- or the owner of this account-- is removing sourced information and calling it "libelous," which can be a sign of paid editing. StartOkayStop (talk) 19:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Andrew Rosindell, you may be blocked from editing. The Times is a WP:Reliable source - Arjayay (talk) 19:26, 5 September 2023 (UTC)


 * It is a legal matter and the Times are subject to legal action. No other credible media or web page is publishing to avoid legal action themselves. This is libelous content. Peterpeterson111 (talk) 19:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Czello (music) 19:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Andrew Rosindell
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Andrew Rosindell, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Peterpeterson111&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1206536528 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andrew_Rosindell&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1206536528%7CAndrew%20Rosindell%5D%5D Ask for help])