User talk:Petertoledo

Petertoledo should be banned for his commercial activities at Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.18.224.169 (talk) 04:39, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Esquire (magazine) UK
A tag has been placed on Esquire (magazine) UK, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Chenzw   Talk   11:12, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

August 2008
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Kipoc (talk) 22:00, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Response to comment regarding Espadrilles edits
Hello - Firstly, my removal of the link to your page was a result of the edit appearing on my watchlist - I treated it as an individual edit, as I was looking specifically at the most recent changes of the pages, not as an examination of the whole article. As a result of the information you posted on my talk page, I have looked at all the external links on the page and removed them (1 dead, rest commercial advertising). Any editor can do this, including yourself, should they spot violations of wikipedia policy. Looking back at edits I have reverted, my reasoning for all reversions is that placing links to websites that you own/manage or placing conflict of interest promotional information (such as your name as a leading designer) is a violation of WP:EL and WP:COI. To avoid any conflict of interest, please post the information which you think is appropriate to the article on the article's talk page with references to verify notability. Thanks, Kipoc (talk) 06:30, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Also to clarify, you mentioned that you posted an up to date piece on Espadrille design which was then deleted. I didn't delete that information as far as I could see in the edit history.  If you believe the article could be written in a more neutral point of view with references and no advertising/promotion, that would be beneficial to the article.  Kipoc (talk) 06:44, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Please see my response to your followup at my talk page. Kipoc (talk) 08:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)