User talk:Peterwalker89

Image copyright problem with Image:666ways.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:666ways.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:39, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

October 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Soulja Boy, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Soulja Boy was changed by Peterwalker89 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-10-02T22:56:50+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 22:56, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:DVDLiveatOrpheum.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:DVDLiveatOrpheum.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:20, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:HIMPromoShot.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:HIMPromoShot.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:22, 28 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Save_Us   †  03:22, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Lily lazer.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lily lazer.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Yerpo (talk) 13:41, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Gaslipstick.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gaslipstick.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 05:35, 15 November 2008 (UTC) --Mosmof (talk) 05:35, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Mige amour.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mige amour.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 05:45, 15 November 2008 (UTC) --Mosmof (talk) 05:45, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Adam scott.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Adam scott.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Articles for deletion nomination of Screamworks: Love in Theory and Practice
I have nominated Screamworks: Love in Theory and Practice, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Screamworks: Love in Theory and Practice. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 20:01, 10 June 2009 (UTC)