User talk:Peterzbear

Welcome!

Hello, Peterzbear, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Snowman Guy (talk) 23:50, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

John Russell (Politician)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of John Russell (Politician), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.johnrussellforcongress.com/page.asp?PageId=20.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:23, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Russell (Politician)


A tag has been placed on John Russell (Politician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 02:24, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

John Russell (Politician)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of John Russell (Politician), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.johnrussellforcongress.com/page.asp?PageId=20.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:31, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Russell (Politician)


A tag has been placed on John Russell (Politician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  ttonyb (talk) 02:36, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as John Russell (Politician), to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  ttonyb (talk) 02:44, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to John Russell (Politician). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Diannaa (Talk) 02:54, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Russell (Politician)


A tag has been placed on John Russell (Politician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. I n k a 888 03:14, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Russell (Florida Politician)


A tag has been placed on John Russell (Florida Politician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  ttonyb (talk) 03:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 03:28, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Russell (Florida Politician)


A tag has been placed on John Russell (Florida Politician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  ttonyb (talk) 23:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mike Yost


A tag has been placed on Mike Yost requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Prestonmag (talk) 22:36, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Chief Financial Officer of Florida General Election, 2010 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jay-Sebastos (talk) 23:35, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Template:ElectionsFL has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jay-Sebastos (talk) 00:07, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Template:ElectionsFL has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Orphan Wiki 00:10, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Template:ElectionsFL constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Jay-Sebastos (talk) 00:10, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tampa mayoral election, 2011


A tag has been placed on Tampa mayoral election, 2011 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:31, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Your edits
I appreciate your attempts, but some of the pages you have set up are missing key information, misusing templates, are uncategorized, and have spelling mistakes. Please refer to older election pages when starting a new election page, and be more careful in your editing style. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:53, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Dean Heller, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''This is another example. Sources say he will announce, but he has not at this point announced anything.'' – Muboshgu (talk) 17:55, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Template:ElectionsFL, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:21, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Template help
When adding a template such as Template:ElectionsFL to an election page, you don't copy and paste the contents of the template on the election page. You add to the top of the page just below the election infobox, and that inserts the template. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:43, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nebraska gubernatorial election, 2002


A tag has been placed on Nebraska gubernatorial election, 2002 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Muboshgu (talk) 13:33, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Your editing needs improvement
I see you haven't taken any of my suggestions into account. Your editing remains sloppy and leaves other editors, including but not limited to me, cleaning up some of your messes. You mean well, but please examine some of the old election articles more carefully to see how they are constructed before creating half-incubated articles of your own. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:41, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jacksonville mayoral election, 2011


A tag has been placed on Jacksonville mayoral election, 2011 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:33, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

John Ensign
Thanks for your edits re: Ensign's resignation. Just wanted to remind you that we need some reliable sources on the issue, and we need to be careful not to go beyond them. Until there is reliable, national coverage, it's probably best to wait to update his page and others. In any case, if this is confirmed, he is still serving and will probably not leave the Senate for several weeks. Until he has left office definitively, he is still a Senator and is still serving alongside Reid. Keepcalmandcarryon (talk) 23:20, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the citation. Keepcalmandcarryon (talk) 23:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to revert your edits because they will become accurate in a few hours, but FYI, the statement in today's Congressional Record says Ensign's resignation is effective at the close of business on May 3 (later today, but it hasn't happened yet). Furthermore, as of right now, the House Website still lists Heller as a serving representative. So you jumped the gun by at least a couple of hours. JTRH (talk) 17:42, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jacksonville mayoral election, 2011


A tag has been placed on Jacksonville mayoral election, 2011 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:31, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Proposed deletion of Delaware gubernatorial election, 2012


The article Delaware gubernatorial election, 2012 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Seems unlikely there'll be anything more to say on this for a few months yet.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – hysteria18 (talk) 18:01, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Delaware gubernatorial election, 2012 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Delaware gubernatorial election, 2012 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Delaware gubernatorial election, 2012 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – hysteria18 (talk) 16:05, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Utah gubernatorial election, 1996


A tag has been placed on Utah gubernatorial election, 1996 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  maucho  eagle   ( c ) 23:42, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Utah gubernatorial election, 1996
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Utah gubernatorial election, 1996, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 00:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nebraska gubernatorial election, 1994


A tag has been placed on Nebraska gubernatorial election, 1994 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:37, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I removed the speedy on both articles, with the reason: "underconstruction--do not tag as no content immediately after starting, especially when part of a good series." It's obvious that an article can be written on this that will stand up, and the material in the infobox is enough to start with. (It will of course need references, but that should be very easdy).

However, unfortunately some people here think an article like this should be deleted, some of them even without giving it a reasonable chance to be completed. I suggest you deal with this by always adding one sentence of prose and a reference at the first edit. It shouldn't be necessary, but at present it is.  DGG ( talk ) 06:36, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * This is an ongoing issue with this editor, as he/she creates these pages and moves on when they're at this stage. I'm sick and tired of doing the work on an article that is of such low priority. – Muboshgu (talk) 13:55, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Utah gubernatorial election, 1996 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Utah gubernatorial election, 1996 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Utah gubernatorial election, 1996 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Croisés Majestic (sur nous mars) 23:42, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Herr Peterzbear, this article has been improved so it won't be deleted. Glad you are contributing, but y'all can't get away with creating a detailed infobox without text and avoid deletion.  See the improvements for further reference.  Cheers!--Milowent • talkblp-r  02:57, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

David Wu
Wu has announced that he will resign, but a date has not yet been set (see this article, among many). He is still the congressman until his resignation, so please do not add today's date as his last day in office. Thanks! --Esprqii (talk) 19:21, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Please stop edit warring regarding David Wu edits
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Valfontis (talk) 20:51, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Proposed deletion of San Diego general elections, November 2011


The article San Diego general elections, November 2011 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Denied CSD A1 even though there is no context here. If Peterzbear can't create a complete stub article, he shouldn't bother.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:38, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Wisconsin polling
I don't want to sound mean here but please stop editing the polling section for the Wisconsin senate election. I can tell you don't edit them that much and I will go ahead and clean it up. Rxguy (talk) 21:22, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9
Hi. When you recently edited Agriculture Commissioner of Florida General election, 1994, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)