User talk:Petey Parrot

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Petey Parrot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Wernher von Braun. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Wlmg (talk) 23:50, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Attack pages
Please do not create attack pages&#32;as you did at Lee Munson. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:42, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Carla Bruni
Hard to believe you thought this was an appropriate edit. Whether you were being serious or making a joke you're clearly very bad at this and should stop editing.96.236.148.103 (talk) 04:49, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to 2011 Libyan uprising, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you.--Hon-3s-T (talk) 02:03, 22 March 2011 (UTC)


 * That's fine. Only making responsive edits, like defending property, assets, and related. Have a good day. Stay alive. :)


 * Petey Parrot (talk) 17:59, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Arab Spring. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Please keep OR, such as the definition you put of a masscre and your own POV out of the article. Please also go to Talk:Arab_Spring, where your edits are being discussed as well as your own POV.'' Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie &#124; Say Shalom! 00:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Discussion notification
Hi, please see Talk:Israel_–_United_States_relations. Thanks, un☯mi 02:01, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Arab Spring. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. ''. If you make any more comments like this relating to an editor's religion you are likely to be blocked. Religious bigotry expressed either in attacks on editors or in edits to articles is not something that should be tolerated. '' Dougweller (talk) 06:24, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Talk:Comcast. Sea photo Talk 07:51, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Vandalism? All that was posted was the customer service number to Comcast: 1800-CIA-3000 with a link as well to a video of their technicians breaking and entering. Great logo, too. Is that two C's we see? Don't worry, some have their number.

Arab Spring
Please note that I have placed a WP:1RR limit on this article per an Arbitration Committee decision. Dougweller (talk) 09:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Bruno Breguet
A report has been opened at the BLP noticeboard regarding your edit at this article, Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard please comment there your rationale for the change and provide WP:RS to support your change, thank you. Off2riorob (talk) 09:56, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Barack Obama - edit war
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Barack Obama. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SMP0328. (talk) 14:51, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:2011 Libyan civil war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ''I see you ignored my earlier warning. Given that and other problems with your editing, I am giving you a final warning. Please take this seriously.'' Dougweller (talk) 11:03, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I strongly advise you to listen to Dougweller. You really don't want to continue down this path, please.... - <span style="font-family:Papyrus, sans-serif; color:#775ca8;">Philippe  11:05, 9 June 2011 (UTC)


 * One surmises it is more an issue of sensitivity. Is it a pressing issue as allegations grow wilder, like as pressing as an impotent with a viagra to sway opinion before the wife votes?


 * Petey Parrot (talk) 21:46, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

WASP-17b
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article WASP-17b, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Donald Albury 10:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Edit to 2011 Libyan civil war timeline
I'm going to ignore all the negative feedback you have on your user page discussion for now.

While I thank you for your contribution to the timeline, it is best to represent both sides of an issue, whenever possible. Your post was entirely pro-Gaddafi and I have edited it accordingly to represent both sides of the issue, as this content was available in your sources. Also, try to be a bit more concise in timeline postings as it is a lengthy article to begin with. Lastly, please use the tag when citing sources from news media. I have fixed those accordingly too, so you can go look at the code if you are unsure.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my user page. Daniel Musto (talk) 20:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Pro-history. No room for bias. Concur.


 * Petey Parrot (talk) 21:38, 10 June 2011 (UTC)


 * This timeline is updated with information from valid sources. I'm sorry if you don't like what the news has to say, but you cannot delete them arbitrarily. If you think something needs to be removed, please start a discussion on the article's Talk page first to avoid getting targeted as a vandal. Daniel Musto (talk) 01:42, 11 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Valid sources absolutely. So dedicated to validity only some are worthy of recognition.


 * Petey Parrot (talk) 07:57, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones


The article Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Proverbs like this belong in wikidictonary.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EBE123 talkContribs 13:49, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:39, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gay Free Zone


The article Gay Free Zone has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Gives the impression of being about a concept but is actually about a non-notable event.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 17:41, 14 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Noted. Is this like the embarrassment unfolding for the West in areas of the world which should have been speedily wrapped up months ago?


 * Petey Parrot (talk) 00:08, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Obama Article
A recent edit suggestion by you was reverted. Please add things in a historical and respective matter rather then the trivial commercialization of a political. Obama poop doll? Seriously? Phearson (talk) 05:17, 15 June 2011 (UTC)


 * ?? Capitalism. What's wrong with the Catalonian poop doll in a list of Obama Presidency novelty items? (See: "Obama Poop Doll")


 * Petey Parrot (talk) 05:31, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Anne Frank tree
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Anne Frank tree, you may be blocked from editing. if you keep on quoting sources as you like, but not as the source says you will find yourself blocked and reverted! noclador (talk) 21:20, 16 June 2011 (UTC)


 * It was a fine tree.


 * Petey Parrot (talk) 21:27, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:34, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. WegianWarrior (talk) 14:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)


 * LOL the Free Masons. The world is flat and the universe revolves around Israel. Imagine what planets could have been colonized by now if the world didn't have to stop everytime to ensure their rectal intimacy. The West deserves their punishment called collapse.


 * Petey Parrot (talk) 00:32, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for You were warned about personal attacks and since another editor has removed your comment at Talk:Freemasonry as a personal attack, I am blocking you - final warnings shouldn't be ignored.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 20:52, 17 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Ja, final warnings. Lived with 'em for decades. You're like the Rainbow Likudis at the Pentagon. Go get a colonoscopy. Your crap stinks.


 * Petey Parrot (talk) 22:22, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

I have just extended your block to 60 hours, based on your above response. Please take this time to reflect on your behavior. -- Donald Albury 08:06, 18 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh damn, wanted to make an edit on the irritable bowel syndrome article. When are the film burning parties? If you could:


 * ==Popular culture==
 * In the 2004 film "Along Came Polly," Ben Stiller's character experiences irritable bowel syndrome.


 * Petey Parrot (talk) 10:15, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cowboy diplomacy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. noclador (talk) 14:36, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

ANI notification
A thread has been opened in WP:ANI involving you. Please visit it when you can. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie &#124; Say Shalom! 17:33, 18 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Go grab sand health hazard.


 * Petey Parrot (talk) 04:27, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I've reviewed your edits, as a consequence of this complaint, and I've concluded that you don't appear to be here to edit constructively and in a collegial fashion and that short blocks would probably serve no purpose; as such, I've been bold and increased your block to indefinite, raising, however, the matter on WP:ANI for review. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 09:19, 19 June 2011 (UTC)


 * They're all coming out for the trough.


 * Petey Parrot (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Here's a clip of some of your cousins: ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 19:31, 19 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Intimacy, it's a human right. Ode to the West. Lady ugh ga...


 * Petey Parrot (talk) 23:55, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Hey Shalom boy, is this why Israel needs everyone else to fight for them, they're just not battlefield ready with their Crohn's disease, irritable bowel syndromes, gay bowel syndrome, etc?

Petey Parrot (talk) 00:37, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Done
Enough already .. blocked your talk page too, If you decide you honestly want to edit here ,, email the arbs ,,, I'll grab you the link shortly,


 * if you want to appeal the block, you can send an email to: unblock-en-llists.wikimedia.org. — Ched : ?  03:35, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stonewall Miner


The article Stonewall Miner has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable company. No significant coverage except noting its bankruptcy, went kaput before first development ever broke ground."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Pais  a re pa  02:03, 5 March 2021 (UTC)