User talk:Peteyboy0192

Speedy deletion nomination of Pete Merrill
A tag has been placed on Pete Merrill requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 02:03, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Hairhorn (talk) 02:21, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Pete Merrill. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 02:24, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Peteyboy0192 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Hairhorn (talk) 19:59, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I have blocked your or your friends' other three accounts. Please do not create more than one account for editing or recruit others to make edits that you yourself are not allowed to make. If you do so again, you will be blocked from editing. NW ( Talk ) 00:32, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pete Merrill
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Pete Merrill. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Pete Merrill. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 27 November 2009 (UTC)