User talk:PetiteMimosa


 * }

Speedy deletion nomination of Photographie.com


A tag has been placed on Photographie.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Midhart90 (talk) 01:53, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined
An admin reviewed the speedy deletion and declined it, so the article stays. Congratulations! I was leaving this note to mention that if you get an "edit conflict" when you save a page to see what happened. You can look at the edit history in another tab. You undid the admin's delete of the speedy deletion template, restoring it. I removed it again. Just to let you know. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:41, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

I left a welcome section above for your reference. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:42, 22 November 2012 (UTC)