User talk:Petitx

Reference Errors on 25 January
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Wright & Teague page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=592341393 your edit] caused a missing references list (help | help with group references) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%0A%0A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fw%2Findex.php%3Fdiff%3D592341393%20Wright & Teague%5D Ask for help])

Edit summary needed
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Frze > talk  16:37, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Use Preview button
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to   Wright & Teague , it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. -- Frze > talk  16:37, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Possible conflict of interest
Hi! I notice that in more than four years you have only ever edited Wright & Teague or images directly associated with it. So I wonder, are you in some way connected with the topic of the article? If so, you would be considered to have what we call a conflict of interest, which means roughly that you may be too close to the subject to be able to write neutrally about it. Editors with a confirmed conflict of interest are strongly advised not to edit the article directly, but instead to make suggestions for improvement on the talk page, in this case Talk:Wright & Teague. If you do that, someone will see what you written and decide whether it should be added to the article; if nothing happens, you can add edit request (exactly like that, with the pairs of curly brackets) above what you have written to attract attention. A more experienced editor might also be able to help with the formatting difficulties you've been having. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wright & Teague rings.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wright & Teague rings.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Wright & Teague. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:29, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:18ct gold rings.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:18ct gold rings.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 15:14, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Wright &#38; Teague.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wright &, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:32, 7 August 2017 (UTC)