User talk:Petlover444

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:47, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Jamie, Since Walks 'N' Wags is the pioneer Pet First Aid program (1994) in North America and is offered all across Canada, I see no reason why we would not be eligible for an external link when newer programs such as St. John and Red Cross are listed. Thanks. Petlover444 (talk) 20:57, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I see no reason why not to block you if you continue to add it, per WP:EL, WP:COI, and WP:SPAM. OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:51, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Jamie, If you can provide a sensible explanation for why St John and Red Cross have external links while Walks 'N' Wags does not this issue will be closed and I will not pursue it any longer. Thank you. Lisa Petlover444 (talk) 02:02, 6 October 2012 (UTC) One more comment, I did take the time to read over the 3 links you included as to why you were considering blocking me and I do appreciate you citing them. I am wondering perhaps then if it's not a conflict that we are listed but that I am listing myself? If this is the case I can certainly understand where you are coming from. But if it's that the other 2 names you mention are more recognizable, this is a mistake that I'd like to clarify. Thanks and look forward to your reply! Lisa Petlover444 (talk) 02:06, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * It's not up to you to close the issue. If you really read the policy links I provided to you, you would understand why the two aforementioned links are appropriate. Period. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 02:13, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Ok I did read it and simply am not completely clear...it is a lot of information to digest all at once for someone unfamiliar with what you do. I will read it over again but any clarification would be appreciated given that you are expert in that department. Thanks! Lisa Petlover444 (talk) 02:17, 6 October 2012 (UTC)