User talk:Petoabys

Dispute vs vandalism
Hi. Please note that labelling the edits of editors that you are in a content dispute with as "vandalism" is not assuming good faith and could be construed as a personal attack. Characterising Chanel as a "Nazi collaborator" in the opening sentence is disputable based on the current contents of the article, but it is not blatant vandalism. Moreover, the content was not added by an anonymous account as your edit summary claimed. By the way, I prefer your version of the article as I think Chanel's association with the Nazis is already explained with more nuance in the second paragraph of the lead, hence this message is not the result of me taking sides in this content dispute. Bennv3771 (talk) 10:07, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

June 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mark Wahlberg. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. When there is a clear explanation of the consensus, as there is beside the text you changed, do not deliberately go against it - Arjayay (talk) 09:59, 24 June 2020 (UTC)