User talk:Petr Kulaty

e-gramatica.com
Please do not add any more external links for a day or two. You should allow other editors an opportunity to consider whether the links help the articles. Note also that links should either be given in references by adding useful content to the article, or should appear in an "External links" section. Generally, links in the middle of an article are not desirable (example). You might want to review WP:EL and WP:COI. Feel free to ask me if you want any further information. Johnuniq (talk) 10:36, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Please note that Wikipedia generally declines external links posted by owners of the site in question. Ckatz chat spy  17:05, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Present simple and present continuous
Hello, I've recently rewritten some of the articles you've written, simple present and present continuous. I hope that you'll see that I meant no offence by rewriting of the pages, however, Wikipedia is an encylopaedia, not a "how to" guide. Also, I think you're posting the e-gramatica.com link a bit too often and have removed several links as it's not entirely appropriate, the links are there to provide further information or citations; whilst it is very kind of you to try to help people with their English, it's not entirely appropriate. Kind regards, -- Île_flottante~Floating island   Talk  19:21, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Futhermore, please don't add the link again until you've corrected the grammatical mistakes, such as:

"each test includes from two to five grammar exercises"

- http://www.e-gramatica.com/en/

In which case it should be "each test includes two to five grammar related exercises". -- Île_flottante~Floating island   Talk  10:07, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Speaking french at the time of writing the article, I accidently used the french spelling of auxiliary, but conspiration was correctly spelt, I have just consulted my dictionary. -- Île_flottante~Floating island   Talk  09:32, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Simple past for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simple past is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Simple past until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. TheLatinNerd (talk) 02:39, 29 July 2023 (UTC)