User talk:Petr V

SiteBar
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, SiteBar, has been tagged for speedy deletion because its content is clearly written to promote a company, product, or service. This article may have been deleted by the time you see this message. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an advertising service. Thank you. NawlinWiki 21:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

SiteBar
A tag has been placed on SiteBar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain web site, blog, forum, or other community of web users that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:SiteBar. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. A ecis  Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 22:08, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: SiteBar
Thanks for your contribution to SiteBar page. I apologize to do something wrong. I have just realized there are already some pages about other open source solutions and wanted to add a page about SiteBar. Note this is an attempt to write my first contribution. I will try to do it again in a less offending way. Give me some time. Thanks. Petr
 * Welcome on wikipedia. Allow to me provide a few links that you may find useful: The five pillars of Wikipedia, How to edit a page, Help pages, Tutorial, How to write a great article and our Manual of Style. Is there anything in particular that you need help with? If so, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Regarding the article SiteBar: as the templates on the article indicate, there is no assertion in the article that SiteBar meets our notability guideline WP:WEB. If you want some time to write a good article about it, I can move it to your userspace for you, at User:Petr V/SiteBar, where you can work on the article. If the article meets our notability guidelines, it can be moved back into the article space. A  ecis  Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 22:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. Please read the Manual of Style and Notability (web) closely before you edit the article. Also be reminded that at the moment the article can still be interpreted as Spam, which is not allowed in the userspace. Good luck editing, and again feel free to contact me if you need help or a review. A  ecis  Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 23:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I've had a quick look at the article, and there are a few things that you need to fix. The essence of this is the Neutral point of view. You can believe that SiteBar is a wonderful product, but the article cannot say so. Sentences like "What makes SiteBar popular is a chance to run own SiteBar server and thus keep bookmarks at all time under control", particularly in conjunction with "anybody can download SiteBar server for free" with an external link violates that neutral point of view, bordering on Spam. There's also not much of an indication that SiteBar meets Notability (web). There is some outside coverage, but only just. There is no indication that SiteBar has won an award or that it is distributed via a well known independent medium. The information in the article needs to be verifiable, and the sources need to be reliable. A  ecis  Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 21:42, 19 December 2006 (UTC)