User talk:Petra Liverani

Welcome!
Hello, Petra Liverani, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Marvellous Spider-Man (talk) 10:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

August 2016
Hello, I'm Marvellous Spider-Man. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 9/11 Truth movement have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Marvellous Spider-Man (talk) 06:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Other groups
The other groups section with their website links is promotional. And you reverted Acroterion, they are conspiracy theorists whether you like it or not. -Marvellous Spider-Man (talk) 10:14, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

"Conspiracy theorist" is a pejorative, inaccurate term to use for people who don't accept the official 9/11 story. Many people who don't accept the official story do not have a theory to replace it, they simply find anomalies and questions in the official story. "Conspiracy theorist" is not a term to be used in encyclopedic entries. Please do not delete changes or additions that are perfectly acceptable.

August 2016
Hello, I'm Marvellous Spider-Man. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of an article. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Marvellous Spider-Man (talk) 10:23, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at 9/11 Truth movement shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 10:33, 8 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Please discuss on the article's talk page any further edits, as to avoid breaking WP:3RR. Before doing so, please have a read of WP:ELNO, which pertains to external links and their use in Wikipedia. Best, —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 10:34, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm new to wikipedia editing and find it hard to see where people have written why they've edited my edits. I only now see that Marvellous Spider-Man justified his removal of my content because I didn't follow external links guidelines. He's also claimed, however, that my addition is promotional which I fail to understand but I will deal with the external links issue first.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:11 Truth


A tag has been placed on Draft:11 Truth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://1amendmentcont.blogspot.com/2011/09/us-military-officers-for-911-truth_13.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 22:22, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

I have replied to your question on my talk page, but will repeat my answer here so you will be sure to see it: I nominated the draft for deletion because is a copyright violation. All the content appears to have been copied from the web page http://1amendmentcont.blogspot.com/2011/09/us-military-officers-for-911-truth_13.html. — Diannaa (talk) 02:28, 10 August 2016 (UTC)