User talk:Petrus de Isep

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isépy family (November 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Isépy family and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Is%C3%A9py_family Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vanderwaalforces&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Is%C3%A9py_family reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:35, 20 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, dear Vanderwaalforces! I hope, this finds you well. Thank you very much for your critics on my Draft:Isépy family, which is, as you have noticed, dealing with a historical topic of the Middle Ages in the Kingdom of Hungary! I decided to write this draft in the first place because I saw the article Bogátradvány (genus) mentioning the House of Monok and Rákóczi, with own further Wikipedia articles. As to the notability issue, why would the same be true for another family stemming from the Bogátradvány (genus) and mentioned in the article?
 * Second, the references and information in the article Bogátradvány (genus) seem to me much fewer and less deeper than in my Draft:Isépy family.
 * Apart from this, however, could you kindly, with all your experience, indicate precisely what the problems regarding the references involved are? They are certainly scientific, in-depth, reliable, secondary, and insofar "independent of the subject", as far one can be independent of a subject, treating the very topic in question. They are in different languages, coming from published Latin, Hungarian and German books, some of them are the standard works on the issue. The English written "History" is available through the inserted link, and can be read and evaluated by the readers. Please, let me know, what - besides the general critics - your thoughts on this are. I gladly add tho the references other definitive books on the topic, as dictionary lemmata etc.
 * Many thanks again and all the best! Petrus de Isep (talk) 13:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Isépy family
Hello, Petrus de Isep. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Isépy family, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC)