User talk:Pevernagie/archive

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! TAS 12:36, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.
 * Jeanne here. I am the author of Marie of Hohenstaufen. Yes, while you are correct in stating that Leuven is part of Brabant (Flemish Brabant) to be precise, it can still be considered as a part of Flanders. So I really did not commit such a grave error as you implied. See article on Leuven in Wikipedia. And it is a wee bit rude to add such a melodramatic comment about "historians having heart attacks". As if I had placed Leuven in another region of the world! jeanne (talk) 08:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * As it is the article does state that Brabant is part of modern Belgium so it looks fine now. I used Flanders to specify the region the duchy of Brabant is located: it was an oversight on my part that I failed to say that Leuven was in Brabant. But seeing as nobody had noticed my oversight I do think it was an exagerration to say it would cause a heart attack. You should see some of the errors I have corrected.jeanne (talk) 09:11, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I was honestly convinced that Brabant was a vassal of Flanders same as Brittany was a vassal of France. I'm glad you corrected the article. Cheers.17:40, 4 June 2008 (UTC)jeanne (talk)

It was indeed a bit of an overexaggeration on my part, but Flanders, in that time, implied the County of Flanders, which was France, while Brabant was German. But I didn't really mean anything with it. Pevernagie (talk) 11:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

I saw you left me a message, but then you blanked it. Did I make something wrong? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.139.120.125 (talk) 18:55, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Discussion:christmas
hello why did you revert my edit? i just said the truth, Jesus didn't exist.--62.158.69.232 (talk) 13:30, 12 December 2008 (UTC)


 * While you have the right to question the existence of that person, you do not have the right to delete the rest of the text. Pevernagie (talk) 13:33, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

I am a proud atheist too. i hate all religions--62.158.69.232 (talk) 13:54, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
 * But hating religion gives you no right to vandalize pages on wikipedia. Pevernagie (talk) 14:58, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Rammstein sales count
Not sure why you're changing the value to 26 million from 10 million; the cited reference says 10. If you have some other information, please cite it. Thanks. Quaeler (talk) 09:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * My bad for missing that, but I didn't change it, I reverted an anon user who changed it from 26 to 10. In hindsight probably because some vandal upped it from 10 to 26. Pevernagie (talk) 09:36, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah - makes sense; sorry for the mis-applied stink eye. Quaeler (talk) 09:43, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

RE:
Don't put automatic templates on my discussion page. Thanks, Sir Lothar (talk) 22:48, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Automatic templates are for *newcomers* right ? If you want to talk to someone who's longer on Wikipedia use plain words. That's rule here. Welcome to Wikipedia - mate just think about it what you've written, I've always thought Dutch as intelligent. Thank you :), Sincerely Sir Lothar (talk) 21:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't shoot you :). Yes, you're right - I've lost my coolness, shouldn't jump at this guy. Sir Lothar (talk) 21:34, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism
You should really read Vandalism and Assume good faith, the principle of Wikipedia. Vandalism is not every edit which you don't approve. Nobody feels good when they are accused of vandalism, especially if they are not vandals. Anyway, I will propose merging of the template Template:Infobox Pretender with Template:Infobox Royalty. Regards, Surtsicna (talk) 21:23, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Shepshed Dynamo FC
Please do not vandalise this page any more! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andymac1967 (talk • contribs) 11:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC)