User talk:Pezon prem

Pezon prem
jjjjjj

May 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Help:URL. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Help:URL&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -— Gadget850 (Ed)  talk 10:57, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pezon Prem


The article Pezon Prem has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Hazara Birar (Talk) 10:59, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

The article Pezon Prem has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for this specific type of article, you may want to check out our criterion for biographies. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:45, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Please do not write an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Pezon Prem. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:45, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Atif Aslam, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. S M S  Talk 12:33, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pezon prem


A tag has been placed on Pezon prem requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. S M S  Talk 12:33, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pezon Prem


A tag has been placed on Pezon Prem requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. S M S  Talk 12:35, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Pezon prem. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. S M S  Talk 13:53, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Johnny Depp, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Scopecreep (talk) 14:56, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. You clearly have no intention of contributing constructively to the encyclopaedia, but are here only to try to use Wikipedia to publish a vanity page on yourself, which would be more suitable on a social network site. The first time you did that, you may have sincerely misunderstood the nature of Wikipedia, and thought it was acceptable. However, that was certainly not the case by the sixth time you did so. However, what is worse still, you have attempted to evade page protection by hijacking existing articles on other subjects and replacing them with your own vanity page. There is no way you can have thought that was acceptable, and it is clearly straightforward vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:07, 12 May 2012 (UTC)