User talk:Pfctdayelise/Archive01

Welcome
Hello ,

Welcome and enjoy Wikipedia. Your edits are much appreciated.

These links might help you with your contributions:
 * Tutorial
 * Manual of Style
 * Policies and Guidelines

For Wikipedia-wide involvement, visit the Communtiy Portal and the Village Pump.

Be sure to check out Australian resources, like The Australia Wikiportal, Australian Wikipedians' Notice Board, Australian Collaboration of the Fortnight, New Australian Articles and Australian stub articles.

Also, seeing as though you're a Melbournian, have you considered participating in WikiProject Melbourne? Help is always needed!

By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Preferably, use four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;), which produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page.

Again, welcome.--Cyberjunkie | Talk 05:42, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello, Pfctdayelise, and welcome to Wikipedia! I found your pages when checking links to Falls Festival and found you have an interest in fixing/writing articles for many of the bands mentioned there. I have a similar collection of bands that need articles at Australian wikipedians' notice board/Complete to-do/Musicians that I work through as I get time, if any of them grab your attention please feel free to jump in! Regards -- Chuq 09:47, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

Melbourne
You've been doing a fair bit recently, so I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Melbourne Josh Parris # 03:20, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Band pages
No, I didn't use any particular planned format.. I guess my band pages have a similar format (if you look at Machine Gun Fellatio and Hilltop Hoods, a couple of others that I've done) but it's not really intentional. I happened to find User:David Gerard/music just today (which actually reminded me about your comment!) which may come in handy. -- Chuq 04:39, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Big Heavy Stuff
Got your message, Thanks. Actually, I didn't create the original article. Just did a little expansion and clean up. BTW, check out Underground Lovers -- still a stub. Perhaps you might add an introductory description. ERcheck 17:34, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
I'll be sure to check out the Australian resources. Natgoo 23:52, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Australian Primetime Templates deletion
Thank you for alerting that to me, Pfctdayelise. I have made some comments there. Cheers -- Ianblair23 (talk) 13:21, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

OZ Primetime Templates
Thanks for moving my nomination to TfD - I didnt know that section existed. Bwithh 14:20, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Real Big Prawn
I can tell you the exact content of the article:


 * Real Big Prawn Prawns are edible, shrimp-like crustaceans, belonging to the sub-order Dendrobranchiata. The biggest prawn of the prawn family is the real big prawn. These prawns are really big and are characterised by their extremly big muscles.

A speedy candidate indeed if ever I did see. --Cel e stianpower háblame 18:08, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Hihi!
Thanks for the nice welcome. Just thought I'd reply to a few of the things you said on my page. :)

"It seems like you've got the hang of it pretty quickly. It took me months and months to have anything more than a couple of bare links on my userpage. :)" My website is coded in PMWiki, which isn't too dissimilar to MediaWiki. Also, I hang around a MediaWiki-powered writing forum a lot, so I know some of the basics.  Oh, and I've been here for aaages and made a couple of minor edits before I decided to stay and started an account. :)

"Re: "stuff you'll probably not like, too"... I don't know if you've had a bad experience on WP, but in my experience most people here are pretty openminded." That's my impression, too. "stuff you'll probably not like" is just a bit of self-depreciation done in jest. It prepares the reader for the worst, so to speak.

"Finally, I noticed that you're marking all your edits as "minor". This is not generally a good idea." Sorry, I hadn't realised I was doing that. I'll look into fixing it. Thanks for pointing it out. Zoe.r 22:51, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Higher School Certificate
Sorry about the lack of sources, my information is all hard copy issued via the education system or otherwise not online. But thanks for the link, I'll post it. Necie B 11:49, 7 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Yes, I know a link's not everything, but it does help. Would the letter from the Board to the students in retalliation count? It's not available to the public. I'm looking up the relevant stories now. I've found some SMH articles online that are relevant, but I can't get the actual article, just the headlines in the archive... How did you get the other smh article link? The first and seventh articles are most relevant.

Necie B 00:45, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Hyaku666
Right?

Good to see your yahoo breifcase is still up. Yes, I remember you, and yes, I thought I'd skim through your emails of 2001 before replying. Still a pity you moved to melbourne. =P (And I just remembered where from. Moruya, right?)

So did you find me because of an edit of mine on HSC (I see you're still hooked), or did you search for me after your flipping through your scrapbook? And I thought that SMH article was meant for my scrapbook, and my grandparents..... I didn't think anyone else would put it away. I still get the occasional email from students wondering if I have some spare notes around (also had some funny encounters at uni when class of 2001/2 recognised my name...), but any fame from that seems to have ended.

Yes, our mates Ian and Mark and James are still going away at it with Bored of Studies, it seems. Quite glad I got it off my hands and the original reasons I set it up aren't as significant today (equity in poorly-taught New HSC), and yet they give no recognition to hscstuff, or even to #hsc, but at least they've now changed the text from saying the idea was innovatively theirs.

Have you kept in touch with anyone? I did a pretty poor job while away in 2002, and have done an even poorer job since. Oh well!

So you're into Aussie music still in a big way? Maybe watch for my bro. Went to a fantastic gig of his tonight, at the Basement. Big gig to follow their HSC. We're waiting for this link to turn blue: Hytrada.

So, it seems for you too, the knowledge-oriented procrastination continues. This time instead of working with notes when I should have been studying notes, it's just Wikipedia (when I should be writing 2500-word essays). Tough life.

On the topic of which, I should probably get back to that life thing.

jnothman talk 12:21, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

Rabbit Proof Fence photo
Sorry, but I'm living in NZ now, and I'm nowhere near a suitable fence :) The article is looking good, though. Keep it up! - Gobeirne 18:09, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

Sorry, I've even lived within 5 km of one of them some years back, but nope - dont have no photo! Article is excellent.vcxlor 01:23, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Im really sorry, but I think where I live is much too far away from the fences.. the article does looks excellent at the moment. Sandstorm6299 01:32, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Looks like I'm another in a long line of those unable to help with the request for a fence photo. Perth, where I live, is a goodly many hours drive from the fence, and I haven't been near it for years. In fact, I've crossed it twice in each direction, once each in 1986 and 1993, and apart from that only by air! Unlike the Great Wall of China, the fence is not really visible from the air, let alone outer space! Anyway, sorry I'm unable to help - but thanks for pointing me to a really great article! -- Ishel99 13:29, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

fair use
thanks Gzuckier 01:21, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Melbourne meetup
Josh Parris 03:35, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Watchlist
Yes, unfortunately this method *does* require you to reconstruct your watchlist (I never said it was ideal!) But it should be pretty easy to create a script to generate and then regularly update this from Special:Watchlist/edit. Warofdreams talk 12:48, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

WOW! Friendly!
Hey thanks for not "Welcoming" me :-P

But yeah i might be a little harsh sounding on that page. Anyway thanks for the heads up on adding my self to Wikipedians in Australia and New South Wales, and the other things. Anyway thanks, see ya' User:Frexe (PS - thanks, it's great to get positive feedback to artworks of mine! :) )

Re: News Ltd Style Guide
Hi Pfctdayelise. Thanks for your message. Yes, I have a copy of the News Ltd Style Guide and I find it very useful. It's generally considered to be the preferred Style Guide for Australian journalism degrees and for papers that don't produce their own. I don't think there's an online version of it, but you can buy it from most of the universities who teach journalism or from News Ltd and you can order it online here: for $24.95. Cheers for linking me up with Project Melbourne. I'll be sure to check it out. Sarah Ewart 00:08, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

Ianblair23's RfA
G'day Pfctdayelise, I would like to thank you for supporting me on my RfA. It closed with the final tally of 57/0/0. I can only hope I can live up to the expectations that this wonderful community of ours demands from each of its administrators. If you ever need anything, please just let me know. Cheers! -- Ianblair23 (talk) 02:56, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

Hello and thanks
Hey Pfctdayelise Thanks for the comments about Piano rock. Yep I'm an Aussie from Sydney, hence the Aussie slant, but its a work in progress. Thanks for the links too, being very new to this I was unsure how to "un-orphan" an article so I'll have a look thru them and see how I can improve it. Thanks for the Aussie links too, I think there is stuff I can contribute there, especially for some of the incomplete Sydney suburbs Cheers Westius 23:35, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

The messages you've been sending to 203.82.183.147
Hi Pfctdayelise,

The person you're attempting to send these messages to is currently not using this IP address. That is, unless one of my housemates has been going around writing pointless comments (which I highly doubt).

I rarely edit articles. To date, I can only recollect editing articles on Trams in Sydney, Speed Grapher, and Ninja Gaiden. I'd prefer not to create an account because I'd rarely use it.

Thanks

(I hope this was the right way to communicate this - can't say I know all of these intricacies of wikipedia too well)

Meetup
Hey, I was just checking out the userpages for people who are going to the Melbourne meetup, and I noticed you go to Melbourne Uni. What do you study? --bainer (talk) 05:04, 24 November 2005 (UTC)


 * My major's Australian Studies, but in that I'm doing about half history and half pol sci. I've only finished two years now! Still three more left. --bainer (talk) 21:06, 24 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Actually, I'm doing that subject too, so there's a pretty strong chance I'll run into you! --bainer (talk) 23:57, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Australian Aboriginal flag is the current ACOTF
Hi. You voted for Australian Aboriginal flag to be selected as Australian Collaboration of the fortnight. It has now been selected. Please improve it in any way you see fit. Thanks. --Scott Davis Talk 13:57, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Commons
Yes. I stopped uploading to EN soon after the introduction of the commons. Many on EN were loaded before the commons. That's history for you. Now where is the agent to move all GFDL and PD images from EN to Commons, eh? That's what I'd like to know. Best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)

Melbourne wikiProject
Hi Pfctdayelise, thanks for your comment on my page, most touched. I checked out the wikiProject:Melbourne page and would be glad to contribute what little I can to the cause. I won't get too heavily involved at the moment due to the usual, but I have been known to get a little obsessed with things like this. Hari Seldon would be proud of you guys' efforts. Felix Dance 12:02, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

Numbered paragraphs as a list

 * 1) This is a test.
 * 2) This is also a test.
 * 1) This is also a test.
 * 1) This is also a test.
 * 1) This is also a test.

The syntax:

#:&amp;nbsp; #:&amp;nbsp; #:&amp;nbsp; Hope this helps. → Ξxtreme Unction {yak ł blah } 00:55, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) This is a test.
 * 1) This is also a test.

Numbered paragraphs as a list, redux
 This is the first paragraph under item 1. Blah blah blah blah blah blah, blah blah blah blah blah; blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. This is the second paragraph under item 1. Blah blah blah blah blah blah, blah blah blah blah blah; blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. This is the first paragraph under item 2. Blah blah blah blah blah blah, blah blah blah blah blah; blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. This is the second paragraph under item 2. Blah blah blah blah blah blah, blah blah blah blah blah; blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.  I think what the wikiverse is telling you is to use straight HTML. Click the edit button to see the syntax. ;) → Ξxtreme Unction {yak ł blah } 02:00, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

Music pictures
Hi, you mentioned music pictures on the AWNB. The Music of Australia is looking very bare at the moment without any pictures, a couple of those pictures would probably look really good there. Astrokey44 10:22, 1 December 2005 (UTC) Er, nevermind I have found some, though theres a few sub-pages that dont seem to have pictures yet. Astrokey44 10:33, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the help
Thanks for the help with my image problem! -- J<FONT COLOR="#1f3f00">e</FONT><FONT COLOR="#3f7f00">d</FONT><FONT COLOR="#5ebe00">O</FONT><FONT COLOR="#7cfc00">s</FONT>  02:43, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the great pics of Walter Burley Griffins Melbourne buildings.--nixie 19:49, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * If you are into architecture at all the interior of the Capitol would be worth seeing (assuming you haven't seen it before). I think the stage and seating where changed to put the arcade through on the ground floor but the ceiling is amazing (possibly a little over the top). The pictures you have uploaded are great. --Martyman- (talk) 20:44, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Last time I was there there was restoration work going on (comedy festival, probably 4 years ago), it probably looks better now. I can't garauntee that the images will be used in the Walter Burley Griffin article (becasue of space limitations), so don't go too far out of your way to get one. But if you did get a nice photo of the interior we could always make a Capitol Theatre, Melbourne article to use them in. --Martyman- (talk) 23:11, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Fauna
The article should be completely stable (at least it has been since it was featured) - I found an error in the number of monotremes listed (annoying taxonomic revisions) that I've just fixed, I doubt anything will change until the onsalught of vandalism on the day it hits the main page. So in anwser to your question the most recent version would be the best one to make a spoken version of since all the facts should be right.--nixie 10:46, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Pearle request
Hi Beland, I would like to request a tree-structure report for commons:Category:China. Not sure if you can run Pearle on other wiki's or not. Direction down. I would like a list of how many files and how many articles each category has as well, if this is possible. (Just a summary, like Category:Foo (0 articles, 12 files).) Thanks! --pfctdayelise 03:54, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I can do that, though it will take a while, since my laptop is in the shop; hopefully my code will work just as well on a Commons dump. -- Beland 02:59, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

My RfA
Brianna, thanks for your support on my RfA. The final count was 46/0/0. I hope I'll live up to your faith in me in my use of the mop and bucket. Please accept this wikithanks as a token of my gratitude ;) See you at uni next year! --bainer (talk) 01:03, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Thank you
For the answer at the Village Pump. I appreciate it very much.-- <font color="##6698FF">Dak <font color="##FBB117">ota   <font color="##6698FF">t    <font color="##66CC00">e  ''' 05:42, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Thank-you for reverting vandalism on my user page. I appreciate it - didn't even notice it. Ifnord 02:15, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Spike/Faith pages
Hi, sorry. I just assumed that it would be more general to refer to them as "vampire" or "character" than asign them to the particular show Buffy when they have appeared on Angel also. Plus, "Spike (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)" etc. as a title seems incrediably long winded. Pinchofhope 04:37, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

I did give a reason for my revert, directly after the revert itself. Rude? Perhaps as rude as it is to disregard an existing article, creating a new one and then suggest the older to be merged into the new one? I'm having a hard time understanding why that was done at all. I have given my opinion on the Buffy Project page. Maver1ck 15:46, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

I reverted it back simply because I found the whole thing with the new article and the merging to be too odd to be real. I have already explained what was weird and why, so I'm not sure if there's anything more I can do. I only revert when things need to be set right again. Maver1ck 07:06, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

"Humorous"
Yes, you're right. I think I was too sleepy when I noticed the change, and out of curiosity I visited Biot's talk page and saw that someone else had brought up the American / British spelling thing around the same time period and so I made assumptions before double-checking the actual spelling. I feel pretty silly now haha, I'll change it back of course. Cheers for the pointers to the two aussie pages, I will definitely check it out. ps. sorry it took so long to reply, I have been unable to edit any pages since saturday until now for some unknown reason. --Qirex 02:53, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Commons tools
Hi Bri. You wrote about Wikipedia Commons tips and tools at User talk:Matt c j486. Although I don't think I've put much on the Commons (although I should have the few times I've uploaded images; I didn't really understand it then, though), I had no idea about these tips. It'd be good if you could empty your brains at Commons and/or Moving images to the Commons. Thanks. jnothman talk 03:59, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Minor edits
I wasn't sure what constituted a minor edit, although I do admit that I have made some admittedly major edits and marked them minor, like. I had considered things minor unless they were actually changing the content of an article; Ie putting something in a table was a minor edit, etc. Replying to the helpdesk isn't an edit at all. But I guess it certainly isn't minor. :S

Work on the Help Desk is not such a thankless task. It's more thankful than the same by email: I've tried that and it's a lot harder; atm I'm working at uni full time and can't do any such thing. I've had a good few handfuls of Help Desk thank-yous. And they're usually worth a lot more than the prettier RFA thank yous.

This isn't a minor edit. jnothman talk 12:17, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

List of schools according to VCE results
Hi, I do not think it is The Age copyright, the Age had a pdf file with the schools listed in alphabetical order, I have a list ordered by the VCE results, I spend a couple of hours writing the necessary scripts to extract this information (and some manual editing as well). Since the information itself is not a copyright, and the presentation of the information is as different from the original as can be.

I think the information is important for the parents in Victoria, they are actually waiting for the VCE results to be published and spend quite a lot of time rearranging the data to get the ranges for the schools. They specially buy the newspaper to get the info. The data AFAIK is not readily available on the net elsewhere. So it is notable.

I will do maintenance by myself, next year I would write better scripts to exclude manual processing of the information. I think historical data maybe important too.

I do not think the list is POV as it is the result of automatical calculations. I (or any other editors) can write a disclaimers, showing why VCE results is not always a good measure of the school performance. Have a good day abakharev 02:30, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Hey
Hey, I saw you do so many contributions in english wikipedia. And where are you now? In Beijing or AUS? --vipuser(talk) 09:04, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Moving to Commons
Hey Thanks for the Welcome! Anyway i just got a question about moving images to Commons. Reading the Moving images to the Commons im abit confused on how to actually move the images there, do you need to actually re-upload the image on to Commons, or is there a tool or some quick way of moving it (like the move tab for articles)?

Thanks KaiAdin 21:38, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Copy from Commons
I am a complete novice with the use of images. I just found out about User Boxes and wanted to use this Image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Accesibility.png#file with my User Box expressing interest in the WikiProject Usability but I am having a hard time figuring out how to put that image into User Box on my User:AlMac page. Thanks in advance. User:AlMac|(talk) 12:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Crowded House
Thanks for the compliment. I've been a big CH fan from the beginning. I miss 'em, but Neil's putting out enough to make me OK with it. Too bad he doesn't tour in the Eastern US too often. Or accept my invitation for coffee. Shigpit 00:48, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Thank you
I reverted the vandalism by hand, so I appreciate your helpful tip.24.163.88.33 02:33, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

"old fogie" out of practice as a student
At your convenience please look at my 2 pictures effort where I have been unsuccessfully trying to reverse engineer what should not be rocket science. User:AlMac|(talk) 02:57, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
For the heads-up.--Wasabe3543 23:12, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

For your kind remarks
regarding one of my spoken articles - thanks!

It's a typically hot summer here in Adelaide, and being in a room with the doors and windows closed (without, by choice, any air-conditioning) to do voice recordings isn't that much fun. As I can't do much of my own stuff, and personally I think the Spoken Wikipedia project could do with having more women involved, give us a hoy if you want any assistance with editing.

Cheers! --Macropode 03:02, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Barry Chant
Thanks for the advice re Barry Chant. Editted/restructured to improve notability, not major but still. Still learning! Paul foord 05:25, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your help
Yes I checked out Wikipedia PD resources. Nothing there. I will do as you've advised. Thanks for taking the time, my friend, I appreciate it. I checked out tags too, but got lost in gibberish. Seems like most advice here in Wikipedia is written for those who already understand, rather than for those who would like to understand; and so I seem to go 'round in circles in the pursuit of understanding. For instance, consider this statement in ICT under the heading "Presumed Free images": "These are images that have been unverified to be free of copyright issues, but some user in good faith believes to have been created by the uploader and hence are mostly public domain or GFDL, i.e. redistributable under the GFDL." I understand that this may make sense to someone who is familiar with the context. And I read everything prior to it. But I don't understand the phrase "some user in good faith believes to have been created by the uploader". I'm sorry, but it doesn't ring any bells in my head. I don't think I am stupid. Naive, yes. Ignorant, no doubt. So, you see, I do not understand Wikipedia, per se. I've done this many times, in my pursuit of understanding, and I find that, in many instances, Wikipedia help is written to satisfy the elite, those who know all the nuances of Wikipedia, not for those who wish to gain understanding. Nonetheless, I've enjoyed most of my time here, and it has been rewarding. Thanks again for taking the time to help me --RogerK 04:57, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I appreciate your help more than you know, you're a light for me in this dark tunnel. Thanks for your invitation to talk to you here when I need help; there is no doubt in my mind that I will come for you here frequently, and I just hope I don't become a nuisance, lol.


 * I agree with you, someone or a group should be appointed to oversee WP instructions. And, as you said, had an Admin contacted me about the image before deleting it, as the WP guidelines state, the issue would have been resolved without all this confusion on my part. I like you very much, you are totally up-front and devoid of egotism. It's cool, and really a pleasure to be with you :)). And yes, I did a google search to try to find the page you were looking for ("boring"), but was unsuccessful. Wish you and your loved ones a very happy and healthy new year. Yours also in the spirit of Wikipedia, I am your friend RogerK 07:27, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your RFA support

 * yes, I did cave. But, as you point out, I caved in style =) Again, Happy New Year!! jnothman talk 05:45, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Medical school - image
Hi Pfctdayelise. Thanks for adding the image to Medical school. The caption says "An image of a 1901 examination in the faculty of medicine" — do you know which faculty this is? Thanks, --Daveb 23:49, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply on my user talk page. --Daveb 13:46, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

RFA?
Hi Brianna,

... I was wondering whether you had any interest in being an admin... Maybe when your edit count is a little higher.

I still haven't worked out what use or necessity there is in being an admin if one is mostly around to work on articles and not sysop-necessitating chores, so really that's a decision for you. I'm sure you've considered it before, but I can understand not self-nominating, especially with a lower edit count.

Although I haven't followed your contribs closely, in terms of knowing policy, behaving well and speakin proper, I don't know what major objections there would be. Do you feel you are experienced enough on the Wikipedia namespace?

jnothman talk 02:50, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Well I understand your rant entirely. I have been doing a lot of chores and not as much article editing as I like to anyway. But one can often just get frustrated not being an admin. The admin process is on one hand too easy and on the other too hard. There are many users who should be admins at 1000 posts or so, and others who at 4000 still don't get it.
 * So I've been trying to work out what adminship is by being one. People seem to do very different things with it, and not all admins can be responsible for all admin tasks. Really, once one is an admin though, the wikiness of this place is opened up: I now have the option to edit the MediaWiki namespace for instance, but I still don't do it without some community consensus. To me this opening up of the wiki means I can finally edit the Contact us page, or many templates, without the hassle of waiting for someone to say "I can do it" and also bother. jnothman talk 13:45, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Liberal HTV
Feel free to retag it any way you like. I am heartily sick of this whole issue. Adam 07:15, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Madcowpoo
Hi Pfctdayelise/Brianna, Thanks for giving Madcowpoo a gentle nudge. I wasn't sure how to go about it. --<b style="color:green;">Gary Kirk</b> (talk) 11:29, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I would, but I'm not an admin...yet. Sorry. --<b style="color:green;">Gary Kirk</b> (talk) 14:01, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Re: helpdesk
Um, sorry about the delay... happy new year and all that!

First of all, I suggest getting individual messages - it makes replying to them actually work. Second, you have to reply to helpdesk-l and (cripes I haven't edited in a while) the address of the person who posted the message. There's a good list of stuff which is commonly asked available at OTRS/en which answers a lot of the "Can I enrol at your university/do you know how to contact Paris Hilton" stuff. The list used to be moderated (which stopped the spam) but we had such a backlog that, er, it got unmoderated. So I hope your spam filter works well!

Oh yeah, most of the regulars are on holidays (which means that nothing is getting answered) - so if you're still interested and have some time to burn, by all means go for it!

Cheers, Alphax &tau;&epsilon;&chi; 12:44, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Mentoring /Minor edits
I would not volunteer a workload for another user; if someone who considers themselves reasonably experienced, and feels they have enough time, would like to volunteer themselves, then that's good.

BTW, I think you are marking all your edits as "minor" by default, at the moment. You can change this setting in Special:Preferences. Remember to mark your edits as minor only when they genuinely are (see Minor edit). "The rule of thumb is that an edit of a page that is spelling corrections, formatting, and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'."

pfctdayelise 13:03, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I would be glad to take on the workload of helping another user. Its certainly okay with me, I just don't think I'm deserving of the coveted title of "mentor". Concerning my edits, most are minor right now (I haven't made any new articles lately), but as for most of my edits being "minor" on my contribution list in the past, that's misleading, it is indeed, because I have "minor edit" set by my default on my preferences by default (I beleive when I made a few articles I had them as minor :/ ). I have not been giving my self much credit. :) -MegamanZero|Talk 13:09, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * You are most certainly welcome to continue helping any user you like. You don't have to call yourself "mentor"; just go ahead and do it. As for User:madcowpoo, I was rather thinking of someone like an admin, who is familiar with a wide range of policy. cheers, pfctdayelise 13:15, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Ah, I see. I falsely) believed user talkpage comments, etc. were to be considered "minor". I thank you for clearing that up, and regarding User:madcowpoo, I don't think a admin is nessesary. You, I, and the "common folk" are sufficent. :) I am well versed in policy and the like to be of help (you even more so). We'll manage. :) -MegamanZero|Talk 13:23, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Megaman, one reason I'd like him to have a mentor is so that he stops flooding the Help desk with questions. These could easily be resolved if he was just asking one person.


 * Please look out for context when you reply on the HD. Regarding this, have you read his talk page? Did you notice the comment I left? Did you look at his contribs and notice that he'd left a note on the talk page of an admin asking for the images to be deleted? If you read these things, you will see that IfD would be a waste of time when they can all be speedy deleted by an admin, and since he has already contacted User:Garykirk, he may as well go ahead and do it.


 * You have the right approach in that policy should be followed, and one should not bite the newbies, and be helpful on the help desk, but sometimes you've got to lift your head a bit higher and see the bigger picture. I am bit concerned that this user is more worried about his user page and signature than making good quality contributions to an encyclopedia. He is quite young, and I think he could do with an experienced hand guiding him towards understanding the wiki philosophies. Simply answering his questions, without considering the context they're coming from, won't really help. Like, he asks how to start a WikiProject. I don't think new editors should be jumping into starting WikiProjects straight away. So rather than telling him how, I would find out why he wants to know and try and guide him towards existing Wikiprojects or users with similar interests.


 * Do you kind of understand what I'm getting at now?


 * cheers, pfctdayelise 13:38, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Indeed. I perfectly understand, and I thank you for bringing up that point. I hadn't considered motives or alternive agenda's, in the mist of my willingness to help. Not to say Madcowpoo is going to be a loafer, or say, a troll, we just need to bring him up to standard on what wikipedia is all about. I also did not consider going into detail regarding his new wikiproject and somewhat overzealous behavior (which is just fine with me). In my future dealings, I will desist being so linear in my following of policy and helpfulness and add in some constructive critsisim as well. In closing, I'd like to continue to help him out, and I will take fuller responsibilty of his queries so the Help page can get some breathing room. :) Allow me to assist for awhile and see if I can handle it or not; if not, then I'll let a admin mentor him. What do you think..? -MegamanZero|Talk 14:40, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Madcowpoo
Hi there. Has Madcowpoo used other usernames or ips so I can track all edits? I'll delete what's easily deleted, and see what can be done about the remaining items. What's the gist of the problem with images, copyright? -- Longhair 14:29, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I think I've got most of them. His edits appear in good faith. Any I've missed? -- Longhair 14:35, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * He's creating more? I'm about for another hour or so and try make sense of what he's doing. Blocking seems harsh, unless that good faith assumption runs dry and he's being bothersome. I'll do my best. -- Longhair 14:43, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm ready to get on this now. -MegamanZero|Talk 14:45, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I'll keep an eye on him from afar as well. Let me know if any further deletions are required. Cheers. -- Longhair 15:01, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Okay, I've posted a friendly comment on his talkpage, and he seems to have stopped for the momment. Regarding the shadowing, I've made it a long term goal, and I'll keep up on assisting him periodically. Regarding his most recent edits (here, here, and here), I've inquired Longhair to delete these, and I'll continue to update you both on the situations as we progress. Cheers, -MegamanZero|Talk 22:28, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Template:Education
Well I have been mulling over what to do here and I think that what I want to do is to arrange the schools vs years/ages in a timeline of sorts. Have a look at Sam Rosen (sportscaster) for an idea of what I'm talking about. There is a lot of overlap between the various age groups per school type. For example in the U.K. there is state funding for places for 4 year olds (called early years) but compulsory education does not start until 5 years. So pre-schools go from 2-5 years and primary schools start at 4. This carries on all the way up to 14 where vocational starts but overlaps secondary through to 18.

So what I want to do is to set up a test template using the timeline script and see if I can get it close to what I want, and then go in and replace the Template:Education.

Whaddya think? Frelke 07:51, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Moruya etc
Hi - thanks for your kind messages. I go to the coast regularly and we often drive down to Moruya. I have good intentions about writing lots more on the area, particularly natural history - I am so woefully ignorant and I find that contributing to the Wikipedia is an excellent incentive to research and to write up what I have found - I can then find it again easily and some of it might stick in my memory by writing it down. Beats crossword puzzles and Sudoko which was getting a little repetitive :-).

As for RfA, I wouldn't necessarily say no, and am very flattered by your offer. I feel very much also a pleb but in a way am very happy to continue to edit. I am somewhat inspired by Adam Carr who has taken a firm line and said that editing is what he wants to do. Then again the roll-back button would be nice as I do revert vandalism ... I am not sure whether I am such a respected wikipedian though as I seem to attract sometimes the harsh words of others - especially on WP:AWNB. Gets a bit depressing sometimes :-( but that is what of course happens when you only read words and cannot include non-verbal cues - the comments are probably not really meant personally or intended to be as harsh as they come across.  The advice from my better-half is to stay away from talk pages and just edit!  Hence my ambivalence - especially exposing myself on RfA - not least when considering the unkind things that have been sent in that forum -  as a sensitive soul I am not sure I feel like opening myself up for that!  Regards--A  Y  Arktos 20:43, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

BLANKING
Then why was Everyking able to blank his talk page? Jim16 23:47, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

History of Brunswick
Hi Pftctdayelise. I noticed on the Wikiproject Melbourne talkpage that you're interested in gathering information on the history of Brunswick. I wanted to let you know that I've been compiling some information at User:Cnwb/Brunswick. Cnwb 00:03, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey Pftctdayelise, thanks for the info. I only visited the Dawson Street side of the Brickworks. Is all the housing on the other side? How did you get access to take those photos?


 * Regarding Les Barnes' street names book. I've browsed through that at the State Library. It's very interesting. Another good way to find out about the history of specific buildings or streets is to use the old Sands & McDougall directories (on microfische in the State Library's genealogy room). I've been slowly trying to narrow down when my place was built (BTW - I'm in Brunswick East, near Lygon & Glenlyon).


 * Regarding the Retreat Hotel. I've got more info on hotels at another subpage of mine: User:Cnwb/hotels.


 * Regarding editing either of those pages - no, I don't mind. In fact, I'd love it if others contributed. They really just began as a storage place for collating facts before I could work out what to do with it all. Cnwb 21:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks For Your Suggestions
It looks like summarizing the second of the NFPA standard will work out well - thanks for the suggestion! -- Natalya 19:12, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Hi Pfctdayelise, thank you for your welcome note at my user page. I have had a look at the Australian user stuff as you suggested, particularly the Adelaide entries as that is where I am. The SA entries look pretty good to me, so I'll leave that to those doing it (too many cooks and all that.) However, as an old physical chemist, I'll probably have a go at some of the entry under chemistry and especially chemical bonding there are some interesting absences of information that used to be central to that field. It will just take a while to get current again - I've spent the last 25 years after getting a PhD in physical / photochemistry chemistry in the IT & Telecommunications field, so my working knowledge in chemistry is a bit dated. Is there anyone "in charge" of such a topic, if so how do I find out who they are?

I like your personal user page. Wiki meets? how does one find out when where? Regards. JohnT 09:51, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Hi again, thanks for your response to my note. I found the chemistry group, interesting stuff they are working on. Much appreciate the help. :-) JohnT 06:47, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Re: Help Desk
Well, I recall reading it somewhere a long time ago, so I can't really take the credit. But I'm glad I could help! &mdash; Knowledge Seeker &#2470; 07:47, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Ng template
So the problem is out. Thanks for your concern. I asked on my mother wiki and they have repaired that template.--Juan de Vojníkov 19:38, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

my RfA
Hi, we have worked together according to List of schools in Victoria, Australia according to 2005 VCE results may be you want to make a look on my Requests for adminship/Alex Bakharev? abakharev 08:43, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

The contraversy was actualy a surprise for me as well. Thanks for the kind words abakharev 09:15, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the kind words. I will finish my work with the new portion of the new article and officially thank everybody involved abakharev 08:06, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Learning the rules, then obeying them
Thanks for clearing my head on WP:3RR.

Am I in violation of WP:SPAM if
 * There is a proposal to kill some article or group of articles, and I go to the talk pages of the articles and try to place a NPOV link to inform the people who are active there, about the proposal.
 * I tell a bunch of people about a project that I think might be of interest to them, based on the category they in or the types of articles they have contributed to.
 * I do some heavy work on some article, then I visit talk pages of past editors to give them a heads up that I have changed what they had worked on.
 * I write some piece, like in a talk page, then I point other people at that write-up, saying I think they might be interested.
 * No urgency to answer. I am sure to find new ways to screw up regardless. User:AlMac|(talk) 15:32, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your replies and helpful links
Don't worry about the C19YearInTopic question - I could solve that one myself from the link you provided.

WRT WP:HD: I actually find the "encyclopedia" entries more bothersome than the "cleanup" ones, which at least serve a good cause. But I feel a bit less enthusiastic about the whole thing by now. Common Man 18:11, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Re: Userbox/Help Desk
Hey pfctdayelise :) Nah, I didn't think you were being harsh at all.  Since posting that question, I've been learning more about the debate around userboxes.  I agree with you, in that they could be diverting attention away from the task of building the encyclopedia...and so I've become more interested in learning the wiki markup well enough to create little boxes the way I want them to look, without relying on any template at all :)  And learning that markup will surely help in editing the encyclopedia at large. Plus, now Pete Seeger's song about Little Boxes is stuck in my head. Check out the lyrics if you've never heard of it *grin* Thanks for all your input! :: Salvo (talk) 21:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC)