User talk:Pfizerman

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! DES (talk) 23:19, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Novus Consulting
If you want to rewrite this artilce so as to make it more likely to survive the WP:AFD debate, i suggest that you:


 * 1) Remove the "Mission Statement and Guiding Principles"
 * 2) Remove the "Taglines & Slogans"
 * 3) Remove anything else that sounds like a company advertisemet or factsheet
 * 4) Explain why this company is more significant than a random information solutions company. There are many such firms, and simply being one of those, even if a high-quality one, is not IMO a reason for an article on wikipedia. Does this firm dominate its market? Does it doe somethign unusual that other firms do not do, or is it in soem way an industry leader? Has it had an impact on teh community, in ways that most firms do not? If so, say so, and provide verifable sources for those statements.
 * 5) Change the list of clients for a bare lsit to one that indicates the significane of what th firm does for thos clients. A shorter lsit of selcted clients with such commetns would IMO be better than a longer list that was just a lit of names.

I hope this advice is helpful. it is, of course, only my personal opnion, and not wikipedia policy. But I think it reflects the veiws of many wikipedia editors. DES (talk) 23:19, 4 November 2005 (UTC)


 * You responded (on my talk page: Thanks for your imput. I made some quick changes, and would like to hear back from you on the issue. Pfizerman 23:25, 4 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Removing the taglines is good, but adding info on why this buisness is notable or significant is vital. "Wherefore is this business more important than most other buisnesses" so to speak. I have made a pair of format edits, but they are minor. More news stories, and/or more commetns on why they make this buisness important, will help a lot, IMO. Then when you have made some changs go to the AFD page and add a commetn sayign so, and ask people to look at the revised version. Don't expect them to check without being asked. Good luck DES (talk) 23:37, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Reverting
Please look at the page history and revert back to a good version. Sadly there were many consecutive vandal edits to predation, so undo is not going to be much use. Here's a diff between your efforts and the fully reverted page: Richard001 23:30, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Nomination of Novus Consulting for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Novus Consulting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Novus Consulting & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stesmo (talk) 23:47, 17 December 2014 (UTC)