User talk:Pghwatchman

Hi, you can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~

I agree that if he runs for major, that would make him notable as long as you add a reference for that cnadidature. If he does not run, I don't think that he meets the notability guidelines. I note that the rest of the article lacks any independent verifiable sources, and some of the spam/vanity claims like doing lots of pro bono work will need to go if they cannot be reliably supported, particularly if he is campaigning in a political event.

jimfbleak (talk) 19:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, you can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~ . As a new user, you might also benefit from reading this and this. Thanks, jimfbleak (talk) 16:14, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kevin Acklin
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kevin Acklin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable politician, little reliable sources, article is nearly completely uncited.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Patar knight - chat/contributions 20:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Kevin Acklin
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Kevin Acklin. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Kevin Acklin. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Kevin Acklin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Acklin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kevin Acklin & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Dissident Aggressor 19:05, 27 October 2014 (UTC)