User talk:Phaeton68

Welcome!

Hello, Phaeton68, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Anneyh (talk) 18:56, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Welcome, and your edit to Berlin Wuhletal station
Thank you for addition to this article. It is nice to see edits with citations.

However I think that your statement:


 * At 160 metres (520 ft) in length, the platforms are the longest in Berlin.

might be a bit misleading.

160 metres doesn't sound that long for a railway station. I'm sure that the mainline platforms at Hbf would be longer than that, as this would limit IC trains to less than 8 coaches. As you cite Berlins U-Bahnhöfe, I wonder if this should really say something like:


 * At 160 metres (520 ft) in length, the platforms are the longest on a Berlin U-Bahn station.

I don't have access to the source, so I cannot be sure. Could you check?. -- Starbois (talk) 11:24, 17 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes in the source it says that with 160m the platforms are the longest in the berlin subway net . citation: "Die Bahnsteige sind mit 160 metern die längsten im ganzen U-Bahn Netz,da sie ja auch von der S-Bahn benutzt werden." (Meyer-Kronthaler, p308) Of course the mainline platforms in the Hbf are longer but they dont belong to the U-Bahn network. Sorry i corrected the misleading sentence. --Phaeton68 (talk) 18:51, 17 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Many thanks. -- Starbois (talk) 15:32, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=610335956 your edit] to Sphynx (cat) may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:56, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Feline infectious peritonitis
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435921/, which is not released under a compatible license. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License is not a compatible license. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Of course its copied from this article! Should I rewrite the scientific findings??? I cited correctly, so what?--Phaeton68 (talk) 17:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)