User talk:Phalinith

Disambiguation link notification for March 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 100 Pun de Meicho, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commentator ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/100_Pun_de_Meicho check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/100_Pun_de_Meicho?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ongi kuden
Hi, I'm Slatersteven. Phalinith, thanks for creating Ongi kuden!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. You really need to add some sourcing with inline citations.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Slatersteven (talk) 12:55, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Ongi kuden
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://www.dharmadhatu-center.org/lotus-sutra.pdf or elsewhere online. The original document may be public domain, but the translation is likely not. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed and will have to stay out, unless it can be proven that this translation is in the public domain. Regardless of the copyright issue, Wikipedia is not the place to post the material in its entirety. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:33, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I just noticed this article existed (I was actually planning on creating it myself right now, and was surprised it already had been and scarcely a month ago), but isn't it standard procedure to rev-del copyvio material like this because the publicly-visible past versions of the article also need to be under a free license? Also pinging User:TonyBallioni who's better on this stuff than me (was even the one who told me that this was necessary back in December). Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 14:52, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Hijiri 88. I didn't perform revision deletion because I don't know for sure whether or not the translation is in the public domain. For sure the original document is public domain. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:36, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, okay. That works, I guess. I tend to think playing it safe is better, but I'll do a bit more sleuthing. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 23:33, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Ueki.jpeg
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia: You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
 * File:Ueki.jpeg

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:10, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UekiLotus.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:UekiLotus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UekiVi.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:UekiVi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Kyogaku shiken for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyogaku shiken is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kyogaku shiken until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  WC  Quidditch  ☎   ✎  19:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)