User talk:Phantomsteve/Archives/2010/April

Banned
I'm no longer banned, could you ban me again? You're a moron. Please wear a cape while you are banning me :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.198.198.110 (talk) 14:32, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but Steve isn't here right now, so I took the liberty and reported you to the administrators. Looks like you got a nice, long block this time!  Favonian (talk) 14:41, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Incidently, you were not (and aren't currently) banned, you were (and are) blocked. And thanks, Favonian! Your attention to my page is especially welcome as I'm away! --  Phantom Steve .alt/ talk \[alternate account of Phantomsteve] 13:20, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

A question from a newcomer about deletion
Hey Phantomsteve

I recently created a page for Voxnorth that I can see you chose to delete with the argument not notable music group or something like that.

Could you please let me know why you chose to do so, so I can change the article and make sure it won't happen again?

I'm new to this Wikipedia thing, so please tell me if there are any more things I need to be aware of.

Thanks in advance

.Morten —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mosgaard (talk • contribs) 15:35, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I initially deleted it as not notable by mistake, then restored it and correctly deleted it as an expired Proposal for deletion, as there had been no objections to the proposal in 7 days. As I am on my mobile phone, I am logged in using my alternative account so I can't do much (I'll look at this in more detail next week) but you need to show that the band meets the notability guidelines and especially the notability guidelines for bands. The main thing needed is significant coverage in reliable and independent sources, which I didn't find. I'll look at this again next week when I'm back on my own computer rather than my mobile phone, I hope that's OK --  Phantom Steve .alt/ talk \[alternate account of Phantomsteve] 06:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Update: Hey Steve, thanks for your quick answer, I have been collecting links and articles, which I didn't have before - hope that helps. I check these links with the text and the quidelines - thanks for your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mosgaard (talk • contribs) 12:40, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:19, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Request for comment on Edit Filter talk page
Hi Steve, I had actually applied for the edit filter 'view only' rights in order to try and suggest updates to some filters available (especially in NPP). Xeno finally left a reply saying that he'd require some trusted users to vouch for me. Wanted to request you to kindly take a look at the Edit Filter talk page discussion and leave your view about me, whatever it might be. Irrespective of what your view is, would appreciate your comments. Warm regards.   ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪    ―Œ  ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣  09:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Somethingspecial1.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Somethingspecial1.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 13:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:27, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Re: rfa query
Hey Steve!

I want to thank you for your generous offer of a nom for RfA and will happily accept! Let me know if you need anything and when it's ready so I can answer the first round of questions :)  James  ( T | C )  08:15, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Re-ordering of entries for "Singapore International Energy Week" Wiki entry
Hi Steve, Thanks so much for your help on the "Singapore International Energy Week" Wiki entry over the past couple of months.

I was reading through the web page and was wondering if it would be possible to re-order the entries and place the 2010 write-up as the first one after the main intro paragraph of the Singapore International Energy Week. (i.e it will go 2010 -> 2009-> 2008)

Thought I'd get your thoughts on this before re-ordering the entries in the "edit" page. :)

Thanks!

Matthew.lim (talk) 08:24, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I think as a rule, there kind of things are listed from earliest to latest - if a reader wants to look at the latest event, they can jump straight to it by using the Table of Contents. As I'm away from my computer until Monday, and am using my mobile phone, I'm limited in what I can do. If you can wait until Monday, I'll look at the guidelines and see what they say! --  Phantom Steve .alt/ talk \[alternate account of Phantomsteve] 09:01, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * As a postscript, I can't think of a reason to list the events in the order you suggest. If this was an advert for the event, you'd list it in your order, but Wikipedia isn't an advertising venue! As an encyclopedia, I think it is more logical to have the events listed in chronological order from first to most recent --  Phantom Steve .alt/ talk \[alternate account of Phantomsteve] 09:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi Steve, Thanks for the useful feedback. It's something new that i learnt about Wiki! I was also wondering how I can go about changing the logo for the "Singapore International Energy Week" Wiki entry. The logo has been changed and could you advise how i can go about this?

Thanks!

Matthew.lim (talk) 03:33, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * It is possible for you to upload it over the current one, but if you would like me to do it for you, just leave the web address for the image and I'll do it for you! --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 08:07, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Editor Review
I just did a few reviews for the first time - would you check them for me? I want to make sure my reviews are helpful. They are here and here. I'll understand if you don't get back with me for a few days - I'm supposed to be on wikibreak myself. Thank you! PrincessofLlyr royal court 02:24, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * They look good! I'm not actually on a wikibreak as such - last week I was on holiday, and this week there's a lot of family stuff on! As you may have seen, I've not done any reviews in a couple of weeks, but I hope to do some next week. Thanks for doing some reviews - every one helps! --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 06:35, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I'm actually planning to become a regular reviewer. I was very surprised that more users aren't involved in doing reviews. I think an editor deserves to get prompt feedback on their contributions. PrincessofLlyr  royal court 15:45, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Sekute
Hi Phantomsteve,

Just curious I see that you come in on the "Deletion Of Sekute" topic. Just curious why did you mention www.korporatekutie.blogspot.com? And how is that a neologism and copyright infringement? —Preceding unsigned comment added by KKutie (talk • contribs) 11:25, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for contacting me. Firstly, the text on the deleted Sekute appeared to be a direct copy (with a few minor alterations) from that blog (the entry for 16 October 2009, to be precise). The blog clearly states "© KORPORATE KUTIE 2009. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED." - which was the reason for the deletion, as Wikipedia cannot use copyrighted material.
 * It is a neologism, as the only people who use the phrase is the company themselves - I can't find any mention of the word "sekute" in connection with this topic - so there is no indication that the phrase is in common use.
 * From your user name, you would appear to be using an account on behalf of the company - which is against policy, as each account should be for one individual only. Also, Wikipedia is not a place for advertising or promotion. Although many companies and organisations have articles on Wikipedia, they meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines (and Wikipedia's notability guidelines for companies and organisations) - and this is demonstrated by the use of reliable and independent sources verifying the information. I can see no indication that Korporate Kutie meet the notability guidelines, nor does 'Sekute'. I hope this explains why the article was deleted. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 11:54, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 12:39, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Iceman444k
Please could you tell me why you speedy deleted User talk:Iceman444k when it had been restored following a debate on ANI (which is linked form the log)? Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 20:56, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * My bad! I didn't read the comment on the log properly. I have restored it now. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 21:07, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 21:10, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * The protection was a good idea though, you'll need to re-apply it as it ended with the deletion. DuncanHill (talk) 21:15, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Danny Eason
Hello just inquiring why the danny eason page was deleted. Danny Eason has kept many youth off the streets of brooklyn and out of jail... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.163.160.177 (talk) 18:50, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The reason for deleting the article was that it had been proposed for deletion for 7 days without objection. The reason for the proposed deletion was I can find no evidence that the article's subject meets WP:BIO inclusion criteria. - basically, the proposer did not find significant coverage of Eason in reliable and independent sources, and so the article did not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for biographies (WP:BIO). While the work which Eason does may be noble, that does not always equate as notable according to Wikipedia's guidelines! There is also the fact that the article has been unreferenced since 2007 - and in the case of biographical articles, we try even harder to make sure that they are referenced, as it's the only way in which the information can be verified by other people. I did a search for information in independent sources, and didn't find any - apart from a mention in the NYT in a long list of people performing at festivals (9 May 1999) - in this case, Karen Clark-Sheard, Danny Eason and the Abundant Life Youth Choir (July 24) is the entire mention, which would not count as 'significant coverage', as I'm sure you'll agree - and in Newsday (23 May 1999), similarly a minor mention, as well as other similar mentions. I could not find anything which said more than the mention of the choir appearing at a festival (one in 1999, one in 2007, one in 2008).
 * Without significant coverage of Eason, he does not meet the criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia at this time. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 20:28, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Re help desk post
You are one of my favorite editors in WP, so I struggled with how to respond to you - I appreciate the clarification - I think your original note, while well-intentioned, could have been misread. I knew better, but was concerned that Paul might not. Your followup helps make it clearer, thanks.-- SPhilbrick  T  16:59, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * If you ever feel that I may have made a mistake, or that what I type might be misread, please feel to respond as you did on the Help Desk! Like most people, I re-read in preview, but because I know what I mean, it still may not make sense even though it looks like it does to me! That's one of the benefits of Wikipedia, it's a community where others can chip in to any conversation! --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 17:23, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Alpha Data Parallel Systems deletion
Thank you for your message of 29 March.

There are obviously many more articles than those I listed – for example searching for “Alpha Data” + FPGA in Google Scholar returns 333 hits.

I have to say that I disagree that Alpha Data is not a notable company, they are preeminent in the field of FPGA computing and have been pivotal in the development of three of the world’s largest FPGA computers (Maxwell, Hydra and Imperial College’s Ariel). With Moore's Law no longer applicable for von-Neuman processors, new architectures and in particular FPGAs are expected to fill the void. Alpha Data have a significant track record in this field with a number of high profile projects and has twice been named to The Sunday Times Tech Track 100.

Ariadnenv (talk) 00:02, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * As I said previously, I deleted it as the result of the discussion at Articles for deletion/Alpha Data Parallel Systems. If you feel that my decision was incorrect, then you can discuss it at Deletion Review. Due to family commitments, I am busy over the next few days, but I will try to look into this next week, if that's OK. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 07:59, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of American City University
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is American City University. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/American City University. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 13:03, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

RfPP clerking
You might find this script helpful! User:Rami R/rfppClerk. Ged UK  14:09, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, Ged UK! That will indeed be helpful --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 14:29, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

fyi
I thought i remembered this. So just a heads up  Mlpearc   MESSAGE  12:24, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, but the image has not been in the signature since I left the message (the 2nd link above was 16th April, and my message was on 19th April - and I double checked the contribs since, but none have been made which have used a sig) - I will keep an eye on the account though! --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 12:35, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Rookie
I wanted to create the account, I just wanted to tell the user that there might be "mistaken identity" issues in the future. That they might want to choose a different name. I will open the account with name you choose and you can change it later if you like. This is the message I sent  Mlpearc  MESSAGE  18:22, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * In that case, it's easiest just to use the standard message! However, in this particular case, the guidelines (see Request an account/Guide) say that it could be created. It's one of the hardest aspects of ACC to get used to - my first two creations/denial of creations were wrong, and they were both over the "similar" issue! It's a learning curve, and I think you're doing OK --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 18:31, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanx for the encouragement, now I know why the "lol's" I reminded you of someone. again thanx  Mlpearc  MESSAGE  20:53, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you for responding to the DucePro situation. It is appreciated. Thanks! -- Riotrocket8676  You gotta problem with that? 01:04, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You're very welcome! --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 07:09, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Yale Political Union
Hi,

Thanks for protecting the Yale Political Union page, the YPU website has been updated and I have edited the article to reflect the changes so I suspect the protection is no longer needed - it is due to expire in a few hours anyway but thought I should let you know the situation.

Thanks

Codf1977 (talk) 10:32, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I have removed the protection a few hours early, as it is no longer required! Thanks for letting me know --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 11:13, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. Codf1977 (talk) 11:19, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Dancehall
Could you have a look at this article please. There's an edit war happening, and peculiar requests at RPP. I'm tying myself in knots about to protect, block, or something else, and I've not really got the time atm to drill into this properly. It's been raised at ANI to, and I replied briefly there. Thanks! Ged UK  11:38, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * It's certainly an interesting one! I'll have a look. I'm toying with undoing Realworld's edits and then full protection while they discuss it further on the talk page - Realworld doesn't seem to be in accordance with the concensus. I'm going to get some food and coffee, and then look at it again when I'm refreshed! --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 12:33, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I have come up with a solution: I have reverted the latest changing (as they are clearly against the current consensus on the talk page), fully protected for 1 week, and asked the involved parties to discuss it. Let me know if you think this was not a suitable solution to the dispute - any advice (if I was wrong in my actions), would be most welcome! --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 13:45, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks fine to me, thanks for picking this up! Ged  UK  15:05, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I have also left talkbacks on the 4 editors involved, so hopefully we'll get some useful discussion taking place --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 15:11, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Banqiao/Banciao Station protect
Hi, thanks for protecting Banqiao Station - I was actually asking for Banciao Station (the redirect) to be protected though, as it's that page which keeps being recreated as a POV fork. Thanks! Taiwantaffy (talk) 18:29, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Oops! I'll look at that when I get a chance, hopefully on Saturday --  Phantom Steve .alt/ talk \[alternate account of Phantomsteve] 23:40, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I have now removed the protection from Banqiao Station, and semi-protected Banciao Station for 1 week - if there are further problems after that, either report it again at WP:RFPP or contact me. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 11:47, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Appreciate it, thanks! Taiwantaffy (talk) 13:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)