User talk:Phantomsteve/Archives/2014/October

The Signpost: 01 October 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:26, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 October 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:40, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 October 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:48, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 October 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:22, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Cirex
Regards; There is no chance 'Cirex' can get the article? even as a 'stub', here is the draft again: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Cirex Thanks Bnotepr (talk) 03:09, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, to have an article, the subject needs to meet the notability. There are specific guidelines for musicians and ensembles, but I do not see that Cirex meets the criteria:
 * Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself.
 * This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries for the following:
 * Any reprints of press releases,, and all advertising that mentions the musician or ensemble, including manufacturers' advertising.
 * Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart.
 * Has had a record certified gold or higher in at least one country.
 * Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country.
 * Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable).
 * Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles.
 * Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability.
 * Has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award.
 * Has won or placed in a major music competition.
 * Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article.
 * Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network.
 * Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network.
 * We do not create stubs for currently-non-notable subjects, on the off-chance that they might meet the criteria in the future. The sources provided did not appear to demonstrate that Cirex met any of the above critera - if I misread them, please let me know which source to look at and which criteria they meet of the above, and I'll look into it further.
 * Being a band, or a solo artist, does not make someone notable; releasing singles or albums do no make them notable. As was mentioned at the review on 21st October, you need to provide more evidence that Cirex meet the notability criteria.
 * Regards,  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 11:14, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 October 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 31 October 2014 (UTC)